NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE
February 28, 2002
NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT
COURT OF APPEAL FILE 464
THAT the Appellant (or Applicant as the case may be), hereby abandons the APPEAL (or application) concerning the judgment (or order) of the Honourable Madam Justice Smith, dated the 2nd day of January, 2002.
DATED at _Macrorie , Saskatchewan, the _28th_ day of _February_, 2002.
Appellant: John D. Lucas
Attached you will find my NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL & NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE to Queen's Bench. I will have nothing further to do with the corrupt courts that refused to REPORT the rape, sodomy and torture of Kathleen Jessica Ross and Michelle Mimi Ross.
Q.B. No. 32 of 2002
PROVINCE OF SASKATCHAN
IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH FOR SASKATCHEWAN
JUDICIAL CENTRE OF SASKATOON
PAUL HRABINSKY, G. A. SMITH
NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE
TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff, JOHN LUCAS, hereby wholly discontinues the within action against the Defendants, Justice Paul Hrabinsky and Justice G. A. Smith.
(a) This decision was made after Justice L. A. Kyle claimed in Q.B. Chambers regarding Q.B. 31 of 2002, on February 28, 2002, "that it appeared that the children (Kathleen Jessica Ross and Michelle Mimi Ross) were sexually abused, but that it was not up to the COURT to report it to anyone." And;
(b) "That social workers knew about it", along with a "some people make mistakes" as an explanation as to why Dueck and Bunko-Ruys had allowed these children to be raped and sodomized for a period of 43 months. And;
(c) That "society shares your concerns, but mistakes are made," with his personal "I'm acquainted with some of the defendants and they would no more assist child abuse, than you would."
The above makes it very clear that Justice Kyle has allowed the personal to corrupt proceedings in his Court. Only a CORRUPT Justice would attempt claiming that 43 months of rape, sodomy and torture was a MISTAKE. Only a CORRUPT Justice would attempt claiming that there was NO other evidence that Dueck was involved in the rape, sodomy and torture, of Kathleen Jessica Ross and Michelle Mimi Ross, after reading Q.B. 2381 of 2001.
Pleadings formulated within 2381 by Michael London Ross, state Dueck and Bunko-Ruys allowed/helped Michael to carry out the sexual assaults. Since neither my wife nor myself have met Michael, we have no comment as to the veracity of his Statement of Claim. We do however emphatically state that it was CORRUPT for a JUSTICE to claim that there was NO evidence and to refuse to report said evidence. All other ACTIONS, including those in the Court of Appeal Court for the Province of Saskatchewan will be abandoned immediately. Kyle's; "I'm acquainted with some of the defendants and they would no more assist child abuse, than you would," crossed the line. It makes it impossible for any right minded person to believe that they could receive a FAIR anything, with Saskatchewan Queen's Bench.
DATED at Macrorie, in the Province of Saskatchewan, this 28th day of February, 2002.
Plaintiff: John David Lucas