Star Chamber Proceedings



I have separated the cases into Criminal and Civil.

I will be concentrating on the cases that started as a result of the Satanic Child Abuse Hysteria in Saskatoon.  I do not and could not in a million years explain how a city of 200,000 people could be overcome and taken in by religious extremists within the Government of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon City Police, Saskatchewan Justice and Social Services. I will try and give some background leading up to the religious hysteria but I would not be able to explain what overcomes people and leaves them unable to think for themselves. I will leave that to a medical doctor.

I will be telling the story of the Ross Children, three seriously dysfunctional FASD children placed into the care of religious extremists after they were apprehended by Saskatchewan Social Services.  I will try to show why the religious hysteria continued for so many years in Saskatoon and area.   The Martinsville Nightmare was very similar to what happened to the people involved with the Ross Children in Saskatchewan.  It started with the Ross Children and their parents.  Most people in Saskatchewan do not know what happened.  The fear of reprisals from Saskatchewan Justice and the religious community has keep people from speaking out and this story will be focussing on the participants within Saskatchewan Justice and in particular Justices of the Court of Queen’s Bench and Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and their involvement in the cover-up.

There are only two cases still before the courts, R v. John Lucas.  John Lucas is charged with defamatory libel.  The complainant is Justice Hrabinsky.  This last charge against John Lucas was stayed by the Crown.

The only other case is the appeal of KVELLO V. MIAZGA.  The appeal has been heard by the same judges involved with the cover-up and we are awaiting their reserved judgement. I think that everyone in Saskatchewan who has followed this case knows what the judgement will be from the Court of Appeal. This was clear when Justice Nicholas Sherstobitoff had another one of the angry outbursts that the judges are becoming famous for when someone (Holgate) tells the truth in their court and has the balls to question the court about anything that may embarrass or otherwise publicly place the court into disrepute in the eyes of the public.

I will be reporting on the Lucas case when John and Johanna file their claim for damages.  The KVELLO V. MIAZGA appeal is just another Saskatchewan judicial farce in the making.

Hendricks v. Swan

PDF File - 36 pages (Case Summary provided by the Court of Queen's Bench.)



Court Cases
Legal Child Abduction In Saskatchewan

How is this child considered to be of First Nations heritage? The mother was not Native. The father was not Native. The adoption parents are not Native. The only First Nations heritage connection is that the mother’s sister had a position with a First Nations child and family services department.  One of the adoption parents worked in the past for the Prince Albert Grand Council.   A Prince Albert Grand Council baby shower is not a First Nations tradition. This did not change the child’s, or his father’s heritage.

Paragraph 25 and 26 of the judgement is bias and racist hogwash. Had the father been of First Nations heritage he would have received custody of his child.

How anyone can call this an adoption is beyond me. There was no adoption. The authorities failed this child by ignoring the United Nations Rights of a Child.   

The father paid thousands for a Parental Capacity Assessment Report. The judge found deficiencies with this report. If in fact the judge was interested in what was best for the child he should have ordered a proper Parental Capacity Assessment Report. The judge decided it was in the best interest of the child to slander his father, his family and his girl friends family.  The father has a past that everyone is wrongfully prejudging.

The only thing that was not in the past was that the father had not filed income tax for three years.  That does not make him unable to care for his child.  He is not the only self employed father or small business owner in Canada that can not afford to pay taxes in Canada to support this excuse for a court of law.

The court order preventing the father from visitation for one year makes this a court sponsored kidnapping. 

If you are a 47 year old, unable to have a child of your own, hang out at the Saskatoon Royal University Hospital and wait your turn.


[Home Page] [Kvello v Miazga] [R v. John Kelly] [Q.B. No. 616, 2007] [About this web site] [News] [Ross Twins Settlement] [Abuse of Power] [Blackmail] [Casinternment] [Documents] [John & Johanna Lucas] [Wilfred  Hathway] [Curtis Malinowsk] [] [Court Cases] [Civil Cases] [Criminal Cases] [Builders Lien Scam] [James Hunter About Me] [The Rule of Law] [Lawyers] [Criminal Code] [Links] [Cornwall Public Inquiry] [Where Fools Rush In] [Saskatchewan Courts] [Satanic Ritual Abuse] [Updates by Month] Home Page

Search Star Chamber Proceedings


[EFC Blue Ribbon - Free Speech Online]


Updates by Month

Paladin of Common Law

Search This Site and all related sites


Star Chamber Blog