November 28, 2010                                R v John Kelly

I wonder why?
 
Who is in charge of justice in Alberta? Calgary City Police officers and corrupt Crown prosecutors? Who swore the information resulting in the defamatory libel charges against John Kelly and how many times has this person perjured themselves in the past?  Rubber stamp justice. 

It looks like the Crown has received some advice from someone with some legal training as Mr Kelly has been informed that the charges are going to be withdrawn and replaced with charges that have nothing to do with defamatory libel. Is the same person going to sign the new information and be guilty of swearing falsely again? Will the Crown have to go on another fishing trip to the City of Lethbridge? 

This has cleared up the reason for the gag order and the slander directed at John Kelly.   Its about the missing money and a corrupt Calgary Police Service that Mr Kelly has been posting about. This is a case of shut Mr Kelly up. 

If the Crown proceeded with the defamatory libel charges the information on Mr Kelly's websites would have been an issue at trial. The trial could have exposed who the thieves are.  Could it be that the Calgary Police know who stole the money and have screwed up the investigation and a murder investigation.  The R v John Kelly case is another screw-up and someone needs to stop these justice idiots from continuing with their unlawful persecution of John Kelly. 

I am assuming that a judge heard the Crown say they were going to withdraw the defamatory libel charges and replace the charges with some other charges where the stolen money and police officer corruption exposed by Mr Kelly on his web sites would not be an issue.   I think this judge has placed the administration of justice into disrepute in the eyes of the public. I forgot, the court has gagged the press and Mr Kelly so the public has no way of knowing what the court, police and Crown is doing.  I wonder why?

November 20, 2010

R v. John Kelly

The R v. John Kelly case in Calgary is looking like a case of cops lacking the ability to properly investigate the loss of thousands of dollars from several non-profit organizations operating within the City of Calgary. After reading the information it looks like there are no rules or regulations governing these non-profits, or the cops.

Continued here.

Wake up Calgary

November 8, 2010

The citizens of Saskatoon made a serious mistake by staying silent when a now disgraced Saskatoon Police Officer, Brian Dueck, with the help of a crazy Crown prosecutor started charging innocent people with ritually abusing children.   The well documented cover-up reaching as far as the Supreme Court of Canada cost the good citizens of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon millions. Just like Calgary the local media stayed silent until the CBC Fifth Estate exposed the embarrassing truth of what happened to the Ross children, their parents, Richard Klassen and his extended family in Saskatoon. The Saskatoon police and Crown used the same tactics, as the news media and police in Calgary are doing in the R v. John Kelly farce.  Don’t listen to him, he’s crazy.

Continued here

Information about R. v. John Kelly is being posted at http://www.albertajustice.ca/

John Kelly has a web site here: http://www.rottenapples.info/

Other sites: Police lay charges of libel, obstruction against Calgary website operator:http://hostjury.com/blog/view/270/police-lay-charges-of-libel-obstruction-against-calgary-website-operator

The case against John Kelly: Canada's unconstitutional Defamatory Libel law has no place in a democracy
By David J. Climenhaga | September 20, 2010
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/djclimenhaga/2010/09/case-against-john-kelly-canadas-unconstitutional-defamatory-libe

Google News
http://news.google.ca/news/more?hl=en&um=1&q=john+kelly+calgary&ie=UTF-8&ncl=dfWHD9Ic-zjb3nMpiF2WGj4Bku-yM&ei=_36yTJmdM46gnQfuxqCoBg&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&cd=1&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQqgIoADAA

R. v. John Kelly

New page is here

The Calgary Police officers involved in R v. Kelly are Detective Reid MERCER and Detective Spencer FRIZZELL.

What's up with the John Kelly case in Calgary?

AlbertaJustice.ca

To any current or former foster kids

A Government is trying to say that kids in and/or from foster care are so concerned about their privacy that they would not want to give their addresses to a class action lawyer who would fight for them in court for abuse or damages suffered while in foster care.

The Government appears to be hiding behind "confidentiality laws" and we need as many former foster kids to say that if they had the chance they would give their address and personal contact information to a class action lawyer no problem and that they would easily waive their "right to confidentiality".

Anyone interested in helping this Alberta Lawyer Robert P. Lee who has been trying to fight for legal action on behalf of foster kids in a class action for over 400 foster kids etc. can e-mail me and tell me if you would be willing to swear an affidavit to that effect to support our brothers and sisters in their possible claim against the government.

If you have any questions or would like to provide you name in support for legal action on behalf of foster kids in a class action.

Contact: John Dunn
Sign in, send him a PM, or email The Foster Care Council of Canada Message Board
 

Foster Care News
The Foster Care Council of Canada Blog

Lack of Accountability and Suppression of Information
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lawyers Rights Watch Canada (LRWC) Home Page

ROBERT P. LEE, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA, EDMONTON

2009-07-06
Re: IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF ROBERT P. LEE, A MEMBER OF THE LAW COCIETY OF ALBERTA
To: Law Society of Alberta
From: Brian M. Samuels, Barrister and Solicitor (BC) & Gail Davidson, Executive Director, LRWC

2009-05-14
Re: Robert P. Lee, a member of the Law Society of Alberta
To: Jennifer Rothery, Discipline Hearing Coordinator, and Heather Ross, Chair of Law Society of Upper Canada

From: Brian M. Samuels, member of LRWC, and Gail Davidson, Executive Director of LRWC

2009-02-18
Re: Robert P. Lee, Lawyer
To: the Right Honorable Premier Ed Stelmach, and others
From: Brian M. Samuels, executive director, LRWCR:::

News LAW TIMES
Litigators alarmed at new rules on Crown liability
By Tim Shufelt | Publication Date: Monday, 07 December 2009

Civil litigators are sounding the alarm about a provincial bill they say will fundamentally and unfairly change the rules for malicious prosecution claims. cont...

KVELLO V. MIAZGA Supreme Court of Canada Places Crown Prosecutors Above the Law Again?

KVELLO V. MIAZGA - Are the judges scamming the judges? cont..

Cornwall Public Inquiry - Update The public release of the report will take place on December 15, 2009 in Cornwall.

KVELLO V. MIAZGA The judges are lying to us cont

KVELLO V. MIAZGA The Globe and Mail. Lies and B.S. The boyfriend. Part 1
The “boyfriend” has a name. His name was Donald George White. A proud second world war veteran cont

KVELLO V. MIAZGA Unsupported trash is printed in a national newspaper cont..

KVELLO V. MIAZGA A paragraph from the judgment.  - It is just incredible that it took this long for the court to reach a decision. The court does not have a history of the judges cont..

Kvello v Miazga - Malicious Court Judgments have been posted on Saskatchewan Justice web site. cont..

Kvello v Miazga - Ross, Ross & White -A short sound clip of the evidence in the Ross, Ross & White case. Three people were found guilty? cont..

Matthew Miazga v. Estate of Dennis Kvello  - The decision from the Supreme Court of Canada is as unbelievable as were the first charges against the Ross children’s parents. I can understand cont..

Kvello v Miazga - The first lie. The children did not make allegations of sexual assault. This was done by Saskatoon Police Officer, Brian Dueck. cont..

News - Justice Delayed is Justice Denied

Kvello v Miazga Lie number 2 - The judges have deliberately attempted to deceive the Canadian public. The judges are implying cont..