The Witches Letter

PDF 3 Pages

A comment made on the Blog about Greenhorn’s letter

The truth hurts.

Justice Hrabinsky and Madam Justice Dovell are common thieves and blackmailers

I have been saying this on the internet for two years. They are corrupt judges.  Just like a man who stood in a Court of Queen’s Bench court room and told the court that the court is corrupt and not a word was heard from the judge or prosecutor.  On another occasion the prosecutor was staring at his shoes. This silence is done so as to not draw any attention. The cone of silence. The fact that Lynne Greenhorn named Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell in her letter left me speechless.  These two judges conduct corrupt court proceedings for Audrey Brent in retaliation for my reporting Justice Dovell’s and Audrey Brent’s former law partner, Nicolas Stooshinoff to the Saskatoon Police because he was blackmailing a Saskatoon homeowner.

There is an attempt by Lynne Greenhorn to distance herself from any connection with Audrey Brent. Ms Greenhorn is Audrey Brent’s law partner.  The heading on her letter does not say this.  The Letter I received from Audrey Brent cancelling the court date when she and Justice Dovell cooked up a corrupt court order clearly shows that these two are law partners.  The cooked up court order is one of the posts that she claims in her letter is libellous.  It is documented and true. It was only after I started posting about the connection between Stooshinoff, justice Dovell and Audrey Brent that Lynne Greenhorn took over the file.  Justice Hrabinsky does Audrey Brent’s and justice Dovell’s dirty work.  Now I have Lynne Greenhorn doing their dirty work for them.

This foolish angry women thinks that she can blackmail me by threatening a court action. She is blackmailing my lawyer For over 15 years lawyers have done nothing about this corrupt pack and their pals within the Court of Appeal.  They leave children to be raped and jail innocent people, people who tried to help the Ross children.  They protect corrupt lawyers and police officers. This is sick justice that is openly corrupt. Ms Greenhorn is not correct when she says, “ I am confident I would succeed in an order in front of any Queen's Bench judge”.  Audrey Brent and Greenhorn think that all the judges are corrupt like Hrabinsky and Dovell.  That is just not true.

This lawyer needs to explain herself at the Lucas trial. What has been done to John and Johanna Lucas by a handful of corrupt lawyers and judges in Saskatchewan is going to continue.  The same judges, Hrabinsky, Dovell and J A Smith. There will be more Ross children, David Milgaard’s and protection for corrupt lawyers and Saskatoon Police officers as long as this pack is allowed to continue to abuse their power.

Greenhorn sent copies of the following pages she downloaded from the Star Chamber Blog to my lawyer.

The Cooked Up Court Order

The Letter to Madam Justice Dovell

This is not rule of law, it is rule by law.

 Letter from court registrar Feb. 24 2004

Letter from Audrey Brent Please note the letter head. Ms Greenhorn is Audrey Brent’s law partner. This is not the work of judges and lawyers.  It is the work of blackmailers and thieves.

Copies of yellow page ads below.

Anonymous said...

So much for free speech. What kind of country has Canada become? I've sometimes thought some of Mr. Hunter's posts were overstated because of the emotions involved. However, Lawyer Lynne Greenhorn has now had the audacity to put in writing exactly what Mr Hunter has been saying all along. They are included in a collection of individuals in Saskatchewan Justice who are corrupt. It's obvious the Brent / Greenhorn duo are confident they are untouchable as to the consequences of their corruption. They have openly revealed themselves for what they are, ethically bankrupt blackmailers and a disgrace to Canadian Justice. Lynne Greenhorn, B.Ed., LL.B., stoops so low as to suggest that the failure for a quick resolution may result in the death of Mr. Hunter: "If he chooses not so to instruct you [Rod Gall], I will have to proceed as outlined in this correspondence ['I will be proceeding to instruct the Sheriff to remove Mr Hunter from the trailer. . . '] ". . . even though I know that your client is in very poor health and this will likely be the final straw."

At stake in the dispute? $1,500.00 (that's right, one thousand five hundred dollars) equity in a camper trailer Mr Hunter now lives in with everything he owns in the world. Greenhorn and Brent obviously will not be happy until Mr Hunter is reduced to fending for himself from garbage bins behind restaurants. On the bright side, the garbage bins are probably cleaner than Brent/Greenhorn's reputation.

Post on saskatchewanjustice.ca. about this letter.

BLACKMAIL, pure and simple!

Posted by J. E. Lucas

J. Lucas

Box 92, Macrorie, Saskatchewan S0L 2E0

Tel./Fax: (306) 243-4812

starchamber@sasktel.net

June 15^th, 2005

Mr. J. Kalmakoff

Senior Crown Prosecutor

Regina, Saskatchewan

Copy:

Mr. Dennis Berezowsky ( Registrar )

Court House

Judicial Centre of Saskatoon

Re: Blackmail

History

Mr. Kalmakoff,

My wife and I only became aware of Mr. Hunter by chance, when one of us was doing a search on the internet and discovered that he had posted positive comments about Johanna (J. E. Lucas). I then did a complete search and discovered that he was also interested in the Ross case and had mentioned Mr. Justice Hrabinsky, in regards to some sort of civil proceeding. To make a long story short, Johanna contacted Mr. Hunter and made various documents available, with my full approval. Johanna has with some deliberation, given Mr. Hunter’s ‘blog site’, at least two links on every page of www.saskatchewanjustice.ca , because of his support for the Ross girls. Nobody as yet, has contacted Johanna and reported any inaccuracies which were posted on her site. If that day should arrive, I imagine she would correct said inaccuracy, with dispatch. My wife has two reasons to try and set the record straight. She was falsely accused and convicted and is also interested in the outcome of her husband’s trial. We both however feel the same about those who use blackmail. If you use your “view source”, on www.saskatchewanjustice.ca , you will find that written within the code, even though it remains invisible. If Ms. Greenhorn had wanted to take action against that which she claims is libelous on Mr. Hunter’s site, she should have done so, without making it contingent on her first receiving something of value. She is by definition, unlawfully blackmailing Mr. Hunter and inadvertently hurting my wife’s site, that I have found is helpful to my own case. Since one of her clients is not a lawyer, she is possibly an innocent. The same can’t however be said about Ms. Audrey Brent. There can be no doubt about what these two lawyers have done. They have knowingly blackmailed, Mr. Hunter. I have no idea whether or not the allegations made by Ms. Greenhorn on Ms. Brent’s behalf are true, but I am positive that they are blackmailers, who appear to believe that they have “friends” within the Court of Queen’s Bench. It is for that reason, that I want them called as witnesses at my trial.

My interest in the letter that Mr. Gall, purportedly received from Ms. Greenhorn, is just another example of the pattern of behaviour that is used by some lawyers in the province of Saskatchewan. It is corrupt to try and obtain a judgment, based on your adversaries known or published views, regarding another justice in Queen’s Bench. It is also a criminal code offence to obtain money by promising not to proceed with an action for libel, that has not even commenced. Threatening to inflame a court, only makes them more culpable. If either of these so called lawyers were honest, they would have reported that which they claim was libelous, regarding Justice Hrabinsky & Justice Dovell & not asked for a payment. A payment by the way, which is arguably inflated.

Since I can download and not upload, (like my wife) I trace back most of the hits on several sites. It is obvious that Saskatchewan Justice was fully aware of the so called libel, regarding members of Queen’s Bench, for more than a year, on “Star Chamber Proceedings“. This attempt to blackmail your opponents into submission, must stop. It has made the entire Court of Queen’s Bench, appear to be corrupt, which I find hard to believe.

A copy of the original that the following was taken from uses an alternate way of spelling Justice Dovell’s (I changed it…) name. An O.C.R. was used, so there is always the possibility of an error, but a match was done with the copy. I am only including the paragraph and follow on that contains the outrageous observation, made by Ms. Greenhorn.

Copy of Relevant Portions of Greenhorn Letter

LYNNE GREENHORN LAW OFFICE

3026 Taylor Street East, Saskatoon. Saskatchewan S7H 4J2

Ph: (306) 955-9544 fax: (306) 955-2656

Email: bandg@sasktel.net

Lynne G Greenhorn, B.Ed., LL. B.

June 12, 2006

Gall Law Office

100, 316 - 6^th Avenue North FAX 652-1110

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

S7K 2S5

Email: gall.law@sasktel.net

Attention; Rod Gall

Re: Gutenberg v Hunter

Dear Sir:

…

“In addition, your client has posted libelous comments about not only my client, but also Madam Justice Dovell, Mr. Justice Hrabinsky and Audrey Brent. I enclose some copies of Star Chamber Proceedings posted by your client and his friend Gerry Hawke. My client would like these postings removed. If your client is prepared to remove the same voluntarily, and not repost the same, my client will accept this. If not, I have instructions to commence an action against him for libel on behalf of my client, and Audrey Brent, who has been called a common thief. As you are aware, damages are presumed for insult to a professional person such as Ms. Brent and I do not need to prove that these comments have damaged her. I am confident I would succeed in an order in front of any Queen's Bench judge, given your client, and Mr. Hawke's comments about Mr. Justice Hrabinsky and Madam Justice Dovell. I trust that Mr. Hunter will give you instructions in these matters so that his family law proceedings can be settled once and for all…”

Thank You,

_______________________

John D. Lucas

Updates by Month