BLACKMAIL, pure and simple!
Posted by J. E. Lucas
Box 92, Macrorie, Saskatchewan S0L 2E0
Tel./Fax: (306) 243-4812
June 15th, 2005
Mr. J. Kalmakoff
Senior Crown Prosecutor
Mr. Dennis Berezowsky ( Registrar )
Judicial Centre of Saskatoon
My wife and I only became aware of Mr. Hunter by chance, when one of us was doing a search on the internet and discovered that he had posted positive comments about Johanna (J. E. Lucas). I then did a complete search and discovered that he was also interested in the Ross case and had mentioned Mr. Justice Hrabinsky, in regards to some sort of civil proceeding. To make a long story short, Johanna contacted Mr. Hunter and made various documents available, with my full approval. Johanna has with some deliberation, given Mr. Hunter’s ‘blog site’, at least two links on every page of www.saskatchewanjustice.ca , because of his support for the Ross girls. Nobody as yet, has contacted Johanna and reported any inaccuracies which were posted on her site. If that day should arrive, I imagine she would correct said inaccuracy, with dispatch. My wife has two reasons to try and set the record straight. She was falsely accused and convicted and is also interested in the outcome of her husband’s trial. We both however feel the same about those who use blackmail. If you use your “view source”, on www.saskatchewanjustice.ca , you will find that written within the code, even though it remains invisible. If Ms. Greenhorn had wanted to take action against that which she claims is libelous on Mr. Hunter’s site, she should have done so, without making it contingent on her first receiving something of value. She is by definition, unlawfully blackmailing Mr. Hunter and inadvertently hurting my wife’s site, that I have found is helpful to my own case. Since one of her clients is not a lawyer, she is possibly an innocent. The same can’t however be said about Ms. Audrey Brent. There can be no doubt about what these two lawyers have done. They have knowingly blackmailed, Mr. Hunter. I have no idea whether or not the allegations made by Ms. Greenhorn on Ms. Brent’s behalf are true, but I am positive that they are blackmailers, who appear to believe that they have “friends” within the Court of Queen’s Bench. It is for that reason, that I want them called as witnesses at my trial.
My interest in the letter that Mr. Gall, purportedly received from Ms. Greenhorn, is just another example of the pattern of behaviour that is used by some lawyers in the province of Saskatchewan. It is corrupt to try and obtain a judgment, based on your adversaries known or published views, regarding another justice in Queen’s Bench. It is also a criminal code offence to obtain money by promising not to proceed with an action for libel, that has not even commenced. Threatening to inflame a court, only makes them more culpable. If either of these so called lawyers were honest, they would have reported that which they claim was libelous, regarding Justice Hrabinsky & Justice Dovell & not asked for a payment. A payment by the way, which is arguably inflated.
Since I can download and not upload, (like my wife) I trace back most of the hits on several sites. It is obvious that Saskatchewan Justice was fully aware of the so called libel, regarding members of Queen’s Bench, for more than a year, on “Star Chamber Proceedings“. This attempt to blackmail your opponents into submission, must stop. It has made the entire Court of Queen’s Bench, appear to be corrupt, which I find hard to believe.
A copy of the original that the following was taken from uses an alternate way of spelling Justice Dovell’s (I changed it…) name. An O.C.R. was used, so there is always the possibility of an error, but a match was done with the copy. I am only including the paragraph and follow on that contains the outrageous observation, made by Ms. Greenhorn.
Copy of Relevant Portions of Greenhorn Letter
LYNNE GREENHORN LAW OFFICE
3026 Taylor Street East, Saskatoon. Saskatchewan S7H 4J2
Ph: (306) 955-9544 fax: (306) 955-2656
Lynne G Greenhorn, B.Ed., LL. B.
June 12, 2006
Gall Law Office
100, 316 - 6th Avenue North FAX 652-1110
Attention; Rod Gall
Re: Gutenberg v Hunter
“In addition, your client has posted libelous comments about not only my client, but also Madam Justice Dovell, Mr. Justice Hrabinsky and Audrey Brent. I enclose some copies of Star Chamber Proceedings posted by your client and his friend Gerry Hawke. My client would like these postings removed. If your client is prepared to remove the same voluntarily, and not repost the same, my client will accept this. If not, I have instructions to commence an action against him for libel on behalf of my client, and Audrey Brent, who has been called a common thief. As you are aware, damages are presumed for insult to a professional person such as Ms. Brent and I do not need to prove that these comments have damaged her. I am confident I would succeed in an order in front of any Queen's Bench judge, given your client, and Mr. Hawke's comments about Mr. Justice Hrabinsky and Madam Justice Dovell. I trust that Mr. Hunter will give you instructions in these matters so that his family law proceedings can be settled once and for all…”
John D. Lucas