"A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof?  It's a proof. A proof is a proof.  And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven."

Prime Minister Jean Chrétien (2002)

How many supernumerary judges does Saskatchewan have or need?

Nicholas Sherstobitoff has elected to become a supernumerary -- or part-time -- judge.

Just like Justice Hrabinsky, Nicholas Sherstobitoff will be in the wings ready to protect a corrupt judge, officer of the court,  lawyer or persecutor in order to protect Saskatchewan‘s higher-up culture of injustice.

Our Prime Minister got elected on the same sex issue.  He has started removing the radical religious fools from his political party.  Is he now going to pad the courts in Canada to keep the religious fools happy? Clearly he will do anything to get re-elected.

Will Justice Hrabinsky hear the first same sex divorce case in Saskatchewan?  Will Hrabinsky‘s judgement be appealed? Will Justice Nicholas Sherstobitoff come out of retirement and sit with justice Richards, the same sex marriage expert, along with the first MacPherson Leslie Tyerman female Pope to be appointed to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal?

The people of Canada continue to elect politicians who shrug off their responsibilities for parliamentary enacted laws written after a debate in the House of Commons in favour of laws written by non-elected religious fools in Saskatchewan.   Canadians have decided the same sex marriage issue.  Its political and judicial corruption that is an issue for Canadians.   It is not a separate issue of judicial or political corrupt, its one and the same issue.

Justice Sherstobitoff should be required to finish his work before he retires. Its been over three years from the time of the Baynton Judgement. The Kvello v. Miazga Appeal is another injustice in the making from this court that protects people who leave 8 year old twin girls to be raped for four years.  Rewriting defamation laws and jailing Johanna Lucas to protect corrupt police officers and radical religious fool judges is not something the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal should be proud about. The Prime Minister Harping about corruption within the Liberal dominated courts will not change in Canada by padding the courts with religious fools.  

Look at Saskatchewan.  Innocent people jailed by these corrupt judges. Police officers who have less respect then a Saskatchewan politician. Highest crime rates in Canada. A corrupt civil service.  Any gangster, anywhere in the world needing a safe haven only needs to read the corrupt judgements that have come out of Saskatchewan courts over the past 16 years to recognize the venerability and gullibility of Saskatchewan Justice.  It is no wonder that the “Ice Queen”, a Hong Kong drug dealer found a safe haven by immigrating to LaRonge Saskatchewan, to open a chicken café.

The people of Saskatchewan can look forward to a continuation of Justice Dovell and G A Smith protecting corrupt lawyers, politicians and judges in Saskatchewan. Who is appointing judges in Saskatchewan, is it Don McKillop and the directors of injustice within the Government of Saskatchewan? We need to start electing judges in Canada.

The StarPhoenix reported: “Holgate said Bunko-Ruys was involved with the case from the very start, but he came under sharp questioning from Justice Nicholas Sherstobitoff over where the evidence was to support that contention. “

Okay, Saskatoon Police Corporal Brian Dueck and Lyle and Marilyn Thompson talk with the three children at their school in September of 1989. This is before Michael Ross was moved to the Thompson foster home. Carol Bunko-Ruys entered the picture in mid October 1989 after Michael Ross was referred to her by social services. Michael Ross was considered to be a victim of satanic ritual child abuse and plans were being made by the social workers, Brian Dueck and Lyle and Marilyn Thompson to move Michael Ross into the Thompson foster home in December 1989. The reference to “the spring of 1990” in the transcripts as the time when everyone became involved is to hide the fact that these religious nut cases were working together and making plans to get Michael Ross into the Thompson foster home. 

Michael Ross was a seriously dysfunction child who was in need of professional help. His unusual sexual behaviour could have been a result of sexual abuse. This was reported by Dr Reebye when he examined Michael on October 6, 1987.  Why nothing was done by way of a police investigation after Michael saw Dr Reebye I do not understand. Dr Reebye was not some child therapist claiming to be an expert in child abuse after receiving a certificate for attending a two day special workshop using art therapy with children who have been sexually abused. He was a M.D. and child psychiatrist.  He would have been an excellent expert witness for the Crown.  Dr Reebye found Michael Ross to be “anxious and frightened“.  He was 8 years old.    
 
Michael Ross’s teacher observed "sexual acting out" and "sexual aggressiveness" from the time he started school in early September 1986.  He was living with his parents. He could not be left alone with other children.  Had Michael Ross received the professional help he needed before he was apprehended, or after he was apprehended, he may have had a chance to overcome his childhood nightmare of alcohol, neglect and abuse. He was apprehended and placed into the care and control of sick crazy people.  Religious extremists who allowed him to sexually abuse his twin sisters for four years.

He entered the world of fried human eyeballs and religious extremists who needed a disturbed frightened child to manipulate into testifying in court about the satanic ritual abuse of children.  His parents were found guilty of child abuse in court proceedings that the public and media were prevented from attending by court order. The proceedings could be best described as a disgusting sick abuse of the court process. Mr Justice Nicholas Sherstobitoff is only one of the hand full of judges who have been abusing their power for over 16 years in a futile foolish attempt to protect the court by protecting the people responsible. The people responsible must be held accountable.  If this results in embarrassment for Justice Nicholas Sherstobitoff and his court, that is a small price to pay for justice for all three of the Ross children, all the others who have had their lives destroyed by being falsely accused or jailed for trying to help the Ross children. 

Carol Bunko-Ruys was involved from the beginning.  She led a pack of delusional nut cases within Saskatchewan Justice, Saskatoon Police Service and social services around by their noses.

Transcript: Ross, Ross and White.
Exam-in-Chief B.G. Dueck
By Mr Miazga
(bolding of text added by James Hunter)

Page 683
Line 12 to Line 24
Q
When did you first receive this file for your investigation?
A
My first involvement with it would have been September of 1989.  It was in relation to charges against another person that was involved with the foster home that the Ross children were staying at that time. 
Q
Okay, and where is -- can you maybe just describe how you’re investigation sort of proceeded from that point?
A
In September of ’89 I interviewed  all three of the children, Michael, Kathleen and Michelle, in an attempt to ascertain whether the person who had just been convicted regarding some other sex abuse charges against some other children might have been involved with them.

Page 684
(Line 7) (Line 16 to line 23)
Q   
Okay, and what happened in the spring of 1990?
A
----- It was decided at that time by myself as well as the children’s therapist, Carol Bunko-Ruys, that they were not suitable to be interviewed at that time.   They were quite out of control and quite emotionally unstable.  Therefore, the file was left in the hands, basically, of their therapist, that being Carol Bunko-Ruys and it was her determination at what time the children would be interviewed.

Page 687
(Line 11 to Line 20)
Q   
So there was three interviews done of each of the three kids?
A   
That’s right.
Q   
And approximately how long were each of those interviews?
A   
We’ll say each interview was approximately an hour to an hour and a half long.
Q   
And who was present during each of the interviews?
A   
Myself, the children, Carol Bunko was also present, Carol Bunko-Ruys, the therapist.  

Cross-exam B.G. Dueck
By Mr. Kergoat
Page 719
(Line 14 to Line 26)
Q 
And these seminar were put on by the Department of Social Services or by whom?
A
No.  The one at the Saskatoon Inn with Dr. Contie was put on by Social Services. The other one was put on by -- and I believe it’s a society for prevention of ritualistic abuse of children, which Dr. Colin Clay from the university is one of the leading members of.
 Q
And the purposes of these were to educate with respect to sexual abuse?
A
That’s right, and ritual abuse.
Q
Ritual abuse? The ritual aspect of it?
A
That’s right.  And I also attended a seminar in Prince Albert several years ago in regards to the same thing.

Cross-exam B.G. Dueck
By Mr. Kergoat
Page 720
(Line 14 to Line 19)
Q
All right. And, is it fair to say that your awareness would have been raised somewhat as to what the dynamics and symptoms of ritual abuse were?
A
Oh, I hope they would be, yeah.
Q
And were they?
A
I believe so, yes.

Cross-exam B.G. Dueck
By Mr. Hillson
Page 728
(Line 25, 26 to Line 2 Page 729)
Q
Yes, sergeant, it was disclosed to you that there would be human and animal bodies buried at both the Streb Crescent and Avenue C addresses?
A
That’s what the children said, yeah.
Page 729
(Line 3 to Line 5)
Q
But you did not conduct any searches there for those remains?
A
Not for those remains.

Cross-exam B.G. Dueck
By Mr. Hillson
Page 731
(Line 4 to Line 17)
Q
And that goes for when she was talking about fried eyeballs?
A
About -- pardon me, about --
Q
Fried eyeballs?
A
Yes, she did.
Q
She did.
A
M’hm.
Q
And you never let on to her that that wasn’t something she should worry about?
A
Well, how do you mean “worry about”? I’m sorry, I don’t understand.
Q
In the sense that it never happened?
A
Well, I wasn’t to judge whether it never happened or not.

Page 732
(Line 5 to Line 11)
Q
Okay,  And you say that -- by the way, did the expert tell you that dead cats would also have been removed if they had ever been buried there?
A
That’s what I was told, that anything that might have been killed would have been  -- if the children were shown where they were, they certainly wouldn’t have stayed there.
(Line 17 to Line 19)
Q
I suppose it sounds like a ridiculous question, but did you find any cookies made out of feces?
A
No, I didn’t.
Page 733
(Line 9 to Line 13)
Q
You’re aware of these jars of blood with labels on them ?
A
I was told of them, yes.
Q
Yes. Did you find any such jars?
A
No, I didn’t.

Page 736
(Line 24 to Line 15 Page 737)

Q
And in the question of the gorilla mask, I believe when you were interviewing the children, that you and Ms. Bunko-Ruys asked the children several times if there was ever any costuming, and the children answered no throughout until quite late in the day, after a break in the video?  A break in the filming.
A
I don’t recall exactly when that came out.
Q
it is correct that you got negative answers to that on several occasions until there was some discussion of gorillas?
A
As I say, I don’t recall whether we did or didn’t. I remember that -- getting some disclosure of it.  It could well be. Be on the tape.
 Q
And is it correct, officer, that you discovered after getting this disclosure, the gorilla mask that, in fact, the children had recently viewed the movie “Gorillas in the Mist”?
A
I don’t know.  I really couldn’t tell you.

Page 738
(Line 10 to Line 18)
Q
But the first time you got disclosures involving the three accused was, as I understand it, in the fall of 1990?
A
No, I wouldn’t say that was the first disclosure.  That was the first time that a videotaped interview was done. I spoke to the children briefly on a few occasions at Carol Bunko‘s office.  I spoke to them in a restaurant the one day that we met. That would have been in May of ‘90, and got some disclosure from them at that time

Page 739
(Line 2 to Line 8)
Q
So when is the first time that his birth parents were identified?
A
A lot of it came through notes that were given to Carol Bunko and myself that came from the foster home, from the Thompson foster home, where notes were made, where they were disclosing to the foster parents.

______________________________________________

Ross, Ross and White
Transcript Preliminary Hearing
November 21, 1991

Page 77
Exam of C. Bunko-Ruys
By Mr. Miazga

Carol Bunko-Ruys, having been previously SWORN, states:

99 to Page 78-107
Q
Now, you have had occasion to meet the three complainants in this particular case?
A
Yes
Q
And when did you first meet them?
A
First met Michael two years ago in October.
Q
And the two girls?
A
I first met Kathy in June of 1990, formally for a session. It may have been that I met her informally prior to that.  She was in a classroom at that time with some other children that I was working with and sometimes when I went to that school, it was a very small group of children, I had some - would sometimes have met Kathy.
Q
Okay.  And why were the children eventually referred to you?
A
The children were referred to me, Michael was initially referred because he was displaying very sever acting out behaviours.
Page 78
Q
And what about the two girls?
A
The same.
Q
And have you maintained contact with them, on a professional bases, since that time?
A
Yes, I have
Q
And how often have you been seeing them over the last year or two years?
A
I see them usually individually once a week. There’s been times when we’ve taken breaks, that we’ve met, you know not for three weeks, when they’ve needed a little rest or I’ve been on holidays or something.  And most recently we’ve met usually once every two weeks.
Q
And do you meet with them in groups as well as individually?
A
Yes, at times.
Q
Now, have you talked to them about coming to court and testifying, in relation to this as well as other cases that are set down?
A
Yes

Search Star Chamber Proceedings

Search This Site and all related sites