A short sound clip of the evidence in the Ross, Ross & White case. Three people were found guilty? Saskatoon Police Officer, Brian Dueck, is dictating the evidence. What you will hear is all the more incredible when one realises that the social workers, police officers, judges (Ross, Ross & White) prosecutors, doctors, editors and thousands of Saskatoon citizens believed every word.
The Supreme Court and the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal judges are falsely claiming that there was evidence that the children’s parents were guilty. This is being done to keep the public from finding out that the Saskatchewan courts and Saskatchewan Justice were in the control of a pack of religious nut cases.
Dueck is dictating the charges against all the defendants on the tape, including some of the children of the defendants. There was no evidence, the same as the Richard Klassen case.
With no more court cases people can write their books and start making the movies.
Most of the comments on the news articles posted on the internet are very positive, well written and encouraging. One would assume that they are being posted by lawyers. Its about time. Where have you been for all those years? Saskatoon will be famous as being the home of the stupidest pack of judicial fools in Canadian history. All those documents and tapes that they withheld can now be published.
The hardest part of making a move will be choosing actors for the part of a Saskatoon judge and two Saskatchewan Court of Appeal judges. No one will find what they did funny, the reason why they did it would call for Larry, Moe and Curly.
Matthew Miazga v. Estate of Dennis Kvello
The decision from the Supreme Court of Canada is as unbelievable as were the first charges against the Ross children’s parents. I can understand that some of the new judges may not have the past history of the case and all the related cases that have been heard by the Supreme Court over the years. After reading the first paragraph of the decision it looks like these judges are lying. The Chief Justice knows the information is not true. The court is taking advantage of Canadians lack of knowledge of the case. The Canadian media knows the truth and cannot continue to stay silent now that no one can say, “no comment as it‘s before the courts“.
If you are a RCMP officer, or Brian Dueck, a former disgraced Saskatoon police officer the court will allow you to knowingly lie under oath in a court of law. We are now going to allow the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada to knowingly lie to Canadians. Are hockey players the only ones not allowed to lie in a Canadian Court room?
The decision is a mockery of justice. The decision has nothing to do with any of the people involved except the Ross children. There is no justice for anyone when the court manipulates the evidence to protect itself from embarrassment. Keep the public from finding out the truth about what happened to the Ross children in Saskatchewan. What the courts and administration of justice did to these children is sick and perverted along with the people responsible. Miazga is not, and never was one of them.
Matthew Miazga was a victim just like the Ross children, Johanna Lucas, Richard Klassen and his family, Dennis Kvello and his family, Donald Leo Ross, Helen Susan Ross and Donald George White.
The first lie.
“Three children made allegations of sexual assault against their biological parents,-”
The children stated that no one sexually abused them. This fact is well documented.
The children did not make allegations of sexual assault. This was done by Saskatoon Police Officer, Brian Dueck. Religious extremists within Saskatchewan social services, Saskatoon Police Service and Saskatchewan Justice were at the time engaged in a desperate search for child victims of Ritual Child Abuse. Crazy people in charge of three seriously dysfunctional Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) children. A boy 10 years old with a history of sexually abusing his twin sisters who were 8 years old.
How were the children helped in Saskatoon. They were all moved into a special foster home where the boy was knowingly allowed to rape and torture his sisters for over four years. Saskatoon is a sick city. It was not just the children who needed medical help.
The court would have us believe that it was the children that started telling the lies that were being reported around the world and in the StarPhoenix about eating babies and the rest of the stupidity about ritual child abuse. The court is blaming three seriously dysfunctional Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder children for the ritual child abuse hysteria in the western world in the 1980‘s. Blaming the children for what happened in Saskatoon’s court rooms is the work of the same crazy people who found the children’s parents guilty. The best legal minds in Saskatchewan at the time were responsible for finding the parents guilty.
It could have all ended at the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal if not for two religious nut-case judges.
Lie number 2
“M negotiated a plea bargain with one of the three accused (who is not a respondent in this case).”
The judges have deliberately attempted to deceive the Canadian public. The judges are implying that Matthew Miazga negotiated a plea bargain with one of the children’s parents or the boyfriend. There was no order for a new trial for the boyfriend so it had to be one of the children’s parents. That is not true and all seven of the judges know this is false. If the person “is not a respondent in this case” then they are implying that it was one of the three accused, one of the parents or the boyfriend.
Richard Klassen’s father was scammed into pleading guilty in return for the Crown staying proceedings against respondents in this case. He was not a party to this case. The children recanted their allegations against him.
Its incredible that it took the children recanting years after before the people of Saskatchewan accepted that there was no truth to the crowns evidence of satanic ritual child abuse. No dead babies, no barbecued babies and the children’s parents and a Saskatchewan war hero were not guilty. The case was gagged and sealed years ago along with the gross misconduct of the Crown and Saskatchewan judges.
What is disturbing about this is that the court without any evidence is implying that one of the children’s parents was guilty. This pattern of deception has been a part of all the satanic child abuse cases and related cases in Saskatchewan. The pattern and deception was the same in the judgement of the Saskatchewan court of appeal. They found the children’s mother was guilty of sexually abusing her children. They did this years after the Supreme Court of Canada overturned the convictions. That was a lie, and everyone involved knew it was a lie.
When two appellant courts conspire openly to deceive the public with no fear of being held accountable as they have done with this case then all the judgments of the court are suspected as being frauds. There is not one of the seven judges who has any credibility.
“Three children made allegations of sexual assault against their biological parents, their mother’s boyfriend and the respondents, who were the children’s foster parents and members of the foster parents’ extended family. Charges were subsequently laid and M, a provincial Crown attorney, prosecuted the case against the parents and the mother’s boyfriend. All three were convicted, and the convictions were upheld by the Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court of Canada overturned the convictions, but concluded that the evidence of the children was sufficient to order new trials against the parents. Meanwhile, taking under advisement the trial judge’s comments urging that the children not be made to endure another criminal proceeding, M negotiated a plea bargain with one of the accused (who is not a respondent in this case). The charges against the respondents were stayed. Some years later, all three children recanted their allegations against the respondents. The respondents commenced a civil suit for malicious prosecution against a number of individuals involved in the proceedings against them, including M.”
It is just incredible that it took this long for the court to reach a decision. The court does not have a history of the judges agreeing on anything. If they were all in agreement then what took so long? Was it because they could not agree on what lies to include? What they have done is pick out the best lies over the years and included them in the judgement and ignored the facts. Anyone who has followed the case involving the children’s parents know that the above paragraph is not just another case of spin doctoring, it is out right lies from the judges of the supreme court.
It was common knowledge in Saskatoon that the court was going to keep names out of the written judgement. Why do that? Everyone knows that M is Matthew Miazga.
Most people could and would understand that the administration of justice would be placed into serious disrepute and embarrassment if the people of Canada were told what happened in the children’s parents case. The truth was gagged and sealed by Saskatchewan justice years ago leaving the lies over the years from the government of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada. What happened to the children would sicken and disgust most Canadians.
Globe editorial Credulity is not malice From
Monday's Globe and Mail
The editor is so credulous he believes everything
he reads.
"Separate charges against the biological parents
and the mother's boyfriend reached the Supreme Court, which found the children's
evidence in those cases credible."
The
above is not only not true, it is an example of credulity of the worst kind. The
boy friend can not protect himself from these slanderous statements from the
editor, judges of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court.
He was acquitted. Where is the credible evidence? The boy
friend was a proud war veteran who fought oversees so the editor could go to
school and learn about a newspaper editors duty to protect the truth and freedom
of the press.
New trials were ordered by the Supreme
Court for both parents.
More trash:
"It began with allegations of extreme abuse such as eating
eyeballs and participating in orgies, made by three siblings against their
foster parents and those foster parents' extended family, 12 people in
all."
JUDGMENT BAYNTON J. December 30,
2003
Nature of the Case [1] In July 1991, 16 individuals were
arrested and charged with over 70 counts of sexual assault against eight foster
children. Many of the children's allegations of sexual abuse were
bizarre and revolting because they involved group and ritualistic sex with
satanic overtones, the sexual abuse and killing of babies and animals, the
ingestion of human flesh, feces, urine, blood and other horrible, perverted and
incredible acts. The case was labeled by the media as the "Scandal of the
Century".
Sixteen
people were charged. This included the parents and the boy friend. This happened
on the same day, same evidence. Listen to a short tape of Brian Dueck, the
Saskatoon Police Officer dictating the charges against the mother here.
The same people were involved with the parents and boy friends trial.
The trial judge was Mary Batten.
Read the descending judgment of
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal justice VANCISE. In
Dissent.
Supreme Court of Canada - Decisions - R. v. R. (D.). I am not in support of electing judges. We all need to let the
national news media go broke. We need to start holding our newspapers and the TV
media accountable. The editors story should be on the "pile of
dumb".
The Globe and Mail. Lies and B.S. The boyfriend. Part 1
“Separate charges against the biological parents and the mother's boyfriend reached the Supreme Court, which found the children's evidence in those cases credible.”
The “boyfriend” has a name. His name was Donald George White. A proud second world war veteran who displayed his medals on his living room wall.
I have been looking for some of the credible evidence that the judges of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and seven judges of the Supreme Court of Canada claim exists. There is none and the judges know this.
This is a link to a article published on the injusticebusters web site.
Is this the credible evidence the editorial is speaking about?
"The kids said they were cut with knives, forced to take part in sex acts with as many as 40 adults, with dogs and flying bats. They were regularly made to eat a mixture of "poop" and raw fish shaped like Easter bunnies. Once, between sessions of eating eyeballs, their parents forced them to watch the neighbours' baby being skinned, buried, dug up, then roasted and eaten.
One of the traumatized youngsters admitted in a Saskatchewan court that the neighbours at first were very angry when their baby was eaten, but later decided to forget all about it.
But the Saskatoon police didn't forget.
Despite the fact that police found no bodies (they didn't look) and received no reports of missing infants, some 40 men, women and children (almost anyone who had contact with the three children) were investigated.
Eventually more than 16 people were charged with more than 60 counts of sexually abusing the children. The Crown was later forced to abandon the case against 12 of them for lack of evidence, while four were convicted and sentenced to jail terms of three to six years. Three of the four are out on bail while appealing their sentences to the Supreme Court of Canada."
Donald White was one of the three.
“’Critics say the reputation of the Department of Justice will be difficult to restore -- particularly when people are convicted in secret. In the foster-child cases, core evidence was delivered in virtual secret since the courts, to protect the young complainants, cleared the public from the courtroom during their testimony. After three of the four convictions, one judge ordered all transcripts of the case forever sealed from public scrutiny.”
Donald White was convicted in this court.
“The foster-children's case involves a supplementary issue. Saskatoon resident John Lucas, who complained about police tactics in the matter, has just been jailed for defamatory libel; his wife Johanna has been found guilty of the same offense and is appealing. (Three others were also charged with libel.)
Critics say something is amiss, terribly amiss, in the administration of justice in Saskatchewan when people such as Mr. Lucas are jailed for expressing their opinion.”
Johanna Lucas did not complain about “police tactics”. She demanded that someone do something to help all three Ross children in the Thompson foster home. She was jailed to shut her up and no one from the news media did anything to help her. The Ross twins settled their claim against the Government of Saskatchewan and others in July 2006 for $560,000. Johanna Lucas was jailed and the twins brother was allowed to continue to rape his sisters in the Thompson foster home for over four years.
“In the Court of Appeal ruling, a dissenting view was given by a third judge, Mr. Justice William Vancise, who said the convictions were unreasonable and must be quashed. He called the allegations "bizarre" tales that "strained the bounds of credibility" and he found "serious doubt" as to the guilt of the accused. Moreover the trio did not have a trial in which "the legal rules have been observed." He said the youngsters appeared to be abused all right -- but not necessarily by those sentenced to penitentiary time.”
The above was printed in the Globe and Mail. The only thing that changed over the years is that seven judges of the Supreme Court of Canada lied in their written judgement. Same thing in the written judgment of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. The editor knows that there was no credible evidence. The editor knows that Donald White was acquitted.
There is a vast amount of evidence that Donald White, and Helen Ross were victims of injustice and a cover-up involving judges of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada. What did a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench think about Donald White’s trial. Part 2.
KVELLO V. MIAZGA - The judges are lying to us.
The judges are lying to us in both written judgments, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. The only sexual abuse that is documented and true happened to the children in the Thompson foster home during and after the Ross, Ross & White case.
Both courts are attempting to rewrite history with respect to the Ross, Ross & White case. The judges are claiming that Helen Ross and Donald White sexually abused the children. The media is reporting and supporting these lies.
What sexual abuse are the judges talking about? We know that the defendants in the Klassen/Kvello case were not guilty. We know that Richards Klassen’s father was not guilty. He only pleaded guilty so the Crown would stay the case against the rest of his family and the other defendants.
That leaves the Ross, Ross & White case. By the time the preliminary hearing started most people had the time to realize that there was no satanic cult abusing children in Saskatoon and area. There were no dead babies being found and no reports of missing babies. Matthew Miazga knew by this time that he had been duped and was looking for a way out.
On November 28, 1991, during the Ross, Ross & White Preliminary Hearing Mr Miazga attempted to end the proceedings. Volume 1, page 715 of the Preliminary Hearing transcript is here. (link to main web site pdf file)
That was the last time that Mr Miazga had any control over the Ross, Ross & White case and the Klassen/Kvello case. It was also the last hope for people concerned about getting medical help for the Ross children who were in the Thompson foster home.
The cases along with the Ross children were now in the hands of religious nutcase social workers, police officers, lawyers and judges. The same “children do not lie” idiots who changed the laws and allowed cases to proceed without any evidence. Rule of law in Saskatchewan became, rule by idiots. In Saskatchewan they were the religious elite out to save the world’s children from being barbecued in a satanic ritual. Crazy people in charge of justice. They are still in charge. They will do anything, including gagging and sealing the Ross, Ross & White case and lying to the Canadian public about Helen Ross and Donald George White.
Are the judges lying about the children being sexually abused by Helen Ross and Donald George White because two Saskatchewan Court of Appeal Judges took 17 months to write up a sick story, page after page of sex with children that they knew could not, and did not happen. The Ross, Ross & White case needs to be unsealed.
Clearly, the now sitting judges believe that anyone acquitted or who had a new trial ordered in their court, or a higher court in the past can have the acquittal or order overturned by simply telling lies about these people in their written judgments. How many of the seven judges heard the earlier cases. Are any of them on record for protecting the reputation of a sick Saskatoon Police Officer found guilty of malice. How about for bragging about not reading the material only to find out in later cases they had been lied to by officers of the court.
Helen Ross and Donald White did not sexually abuse the children and this is supported by the court documents. Judges lying about them is disgusting and places the court into disrepute in the eyes of the public. Judges knowingly lying about a Canadian veteran and war hero does not just place the court into disrepute. The court is the highest authority in the country for the protection of our freedom. These judges do not understand what every child in Canada knows. Who put their lives on the line for our freedom? The Chief justice of the Supreme Court of Canada needs to resign. If she doesn’t the parliament of Canada has a duty to remove her. She is not the highest authority in Canada. She is a disgrace and embarrassment.
KVELLO V. MIAZGA - Are the judges scamming the judges?
“Several judges at both the trial and appellate levels in the criminal proceedings accepted and relied upon the same allegations by the children in convicting their biological parents.”
I think that Canadians believe that the judges of the Supreme Court are very intelligent people. I also think that most Canadians who knew the facts of these cases would be questioning the wisdom of these seven judges after reading the above stupidly and the other lies about the children’s parents and Donald White.
Could it be that two of the seven judges are doing the lying and the other five judges are just nodding their heads in agreement. Keep in mind that the Ross, Ross & White case was sealed in Saskatchewan.
When a previous related case (R v Johanna Lucas) involving Saskatoon Police officer Brian Dueck was heard by some of these same judges they bragged about not reading the documents and praised Mr Dueck. Brian Dueck was the police officer that left the children, two 8 year old twin girls to be raped and tortured with a knife by their brother in the Thompson foster home. This evidence of sexual abuse was then documented as ritual abuse by medical doctors and Brian Duck charged 16 innocent people with ritual sex abuse of the children.
Johanna Lucas was attempting to get some help for the children. Brian Dueck with the help of Justice Hrabinsly jailed her to shut her up. I can understand why these Supreme Court judges would not want the public to hear about their travesty of justice when they jailed her. Fact is that anyone who bothered to read the documents as Johanna Lucas did knew what was happening to the twin girls in the foster home. This explains why the judges bragged about not reading the documents.
The judges are relying on the fact that no one would believe that a Canadian judge could convict three innocent people of the incredible ritual sex abuse evidence presented to Justice Batten. When the Thompson papers disclosed the sex abuse of the twin girls in their foster home during the Ross, Ross & White trial the R,. R. & Witchcraft trial continued. The girls were left to be raped and tortured for over four years. The court was out to save the children of Saskatoon from being barbecued and eaten in a satanic ritual.
Justice William Vancise was one of the three judges who heard the Ross, Ross, & White Appeal.
“In the Court of Appeal ruling, a dissenting view was given by a third judge, Mr. Justice William Vancise, who said the convictions were unreasonable and must be quashed. He called the allegations "bizarre" tales that "strained the bounds of credibility" and he found "serious doubt" as to the guilt of the accused. Moreover the trio did not have a trial in which "the legal rules have been observed." He said the youngsters appeared to be abused all right -- but not necessarily by those sentenced to penitentiary time.”
![[EFC Blue Ribbon - Free Speech Online]](http://www.efc.ca/images/efcfreet.gif)
