R. v. John Kelly

R v. John Kelly Section 300 & 301 infractions of the Criminal Code of Canada Section 129(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada Section 264(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada Court Update: Next court date:

John Kelly

There is a rotten stink in Saskatoon coming from the south west. Many people in Saskatchewan will remember this stink. The smell is similar to the smell that was coming from the Saskatoon Police Service for over four years and continued on at the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Canada for another 15 years.

In the late eighties a small group of religious nut cases in Saskatoon created a sick story of sex with children.  Three Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder children were in a special foster home for child victims of ritual abuse in Saskatoon.  Their parents and a war hero were jailed in Saskatchewan’s first ritual satanic child abuse case. Gag and seal was the order of the day in Saskatchewan courts.  People who tried to help the children were arrested and charged with criminal offences.  This was the only way that the administration of justice could keep the public from finding out what was happening in the courts and the foster home.

The rule of law became, rule by law.   The abuse of process could have ended as quickly as it started if someone within Saskatchewan Justice or the Supreme Court of Canada did what they get paid to do.  Protect the public and the children.

The rotten stink will never go away in Saskatoon.  You can smell it when walking past Justice Paul Hrabinsky’s Court of Queens Bench and Brian Dueck’s Saskatoon Police Service.

The rotten stink is coming from Calgary, Alberta this time.

John Kelly from Calgary has a web site that reminds me of injusticebusters.com.  The RCMP have charged Mr Kelly under the criminal code with libel and defamation.  This reminds me of R v Lucas in Saskatoon.

The RCMP are saying that the charges are very rare. That’s true. The past cases that I know of involved corrupt cops and justice officials using the criminal code to protect corrupt judges, lawyers and cops. 

The police will talk up how rare the charges are in a attempt to deceive the public into believing that the charges are very serious and not a run of the mill civil case.   What Mr Kelly has been saying he has been saying for years. Why were civil proceedings not commenced years ago?

Civil proceeding are public. Criminal proceedings are controlled by the police and the Crown. The abuse of power has been well documented in past cases in Saskatoon.  Add a few corrupt cops, lawyers and judges and you end up with a corrupt police service and administration of justice. The Crown will delay, withhold documents and do everything within its power to increase the defendants legal costs.

Some people are saying that this will be a good thing.  The case could end up in the Supreme Court and these unjust laws will be removed from the criminal code.  The Supreme Court of Canada is not interested in protecting the public from corrupt officers of the court.  Look at the past cases, the court is only interested in protecting the publics image of the court. The result is a public that hold its nose when walking past a police station or court house.

It will not be the Supreme Court of Canada that ends the persecution of innocent people by corrupt court proceeding in Canada.  This will only end when honest cops, lawyers and judges know they will have the support of the general public when they speak out about the corruption within our rotting administration of justice.     End the silence.

John Kelly has a web site here: http://www.rottenapples.info/

Other sites: Police lay charges of libel, obstruction against Calgary website operator: http://hostjury.com/blog/view/270/police-lay-charges-of-libel-obstruction-against-calgary-website-operator

Information about R. v. John Kelly is being posted at http://www.albertajustice.ca/

John Kelly has a web site here: http://www.rottenapples.info/

Other sites: Police lay charges of libel, obstruction against Calgary website operator:http://hostjury.com/blog/view/270/police-lay-charges-of-libel-obstruction-against-calgary-website-operator

The case against John Kelly: Canada's unconstitutional Defamatory Libel law has no place in a democracy
By David J. Climenhaga | September 20, 2010
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/djclimenhaga/2010/09/case-against-john-kelly-canadas-unconstitutional-defamatory-libe

Google News
http://news.google.ca/news/more?hl=en&um=1&q=john+kelly+calgary&ie=UTF-8&ncl=dfWHD9Ic-zjb3nMpiF2WGj4Bku-yM&ei=_36yTJmdM46gnQfuxqCoBg&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&cd=1&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQqgIoADAA

R v. John  Kelly

Calgary

I have read some of the material Mr Kelly has published on his web site and for the life of me I cannot see how, or why anyone could claim that he has committed a criminal offence. There are hundreds of similar web sites in Canada documenting our corrupt administration of justice. Mr Kelly’s site is well organized, easy to read and he offers to supply documents in support of what he is saying.

If what Mr Kelly is saying is true, there is nothing he can do about it in Canada. His only recourse is doing what he is doing.

The fact that he has been charged should be ringing alarm bells. Being charged under a section of the Criminal Code ruled unconstitutional should be automatic grounds for a Crown abuse of process hearing. Someone needs to stop these idiots.

Defamatory Justification Alberta Justice.ca

R v. John Kelly

The people have a right to know. John Kelly has been silenced by the Calgary police and courts. The public are only getting one side of the story.   I have no idea if what Mr Kelly is saying about Calgary police officers is true or not.  The only information available is coming from the Calgary police.

This is how former section 300 and 301 cases started out.  It did not last long. The sworn information, a public document will be the first to arrive on the internet. The John Kelly gag order will follow.  Attempting a shut down of Mr Kelly's website is just talk. If the site is shut down it will be back up online within a week.  One Ontario case (casinternment), the site was back up on a Russian server.

It looks like Mr Kelly has been charged under three sections of the Criminal Code.   He is charged under Sections, 300 and 301.   If the Crown expects that he should defend on both sections then there is something terribly wrong with Alberta Justice.

I would expect the judge will have something to say about this and the section 301 will be gone at the next court date on October 28. All the charges should be dismissed on October 28 and a civil hearing commenced regarding the website.

If someone said things not true about me, I would request that it be corrected or removed. In most provinces I could have the person in court 4 days later if they refused.   If I did this then everything being said about me would become public knowledge.   If what was being said about me was true then I could just wait a few months and hope it would just go away. I could attack their character and credibility during this time.  If I had unlimited resources and the ability to call media conferences and issue press releases knowing this would scam the public into not looking for the truth about me. Just think of the endless possibilities if I could silence someone with a court order and have them jailed if they violated it.  John Kelly would not even be able to ask for help on the internet.  If he has no money for a lawyer what could he do? Welcome to justice in Calgary.

Defamatory Justification

http://www.albertajustice.ca/html/defamatory_justification.html

Posted October 12, 2010

What's up with the John Kelly case in Calgary?

Reading the news reports one would get the impression that the John Kelly case has been before the courts with a finding of guilt.  Inflammatory headlines of his guilt and he has only just been charged.

The information has been posted at www.albertajustice.ca/.   Mr Kelly has been charged with five counts under the criminal code.  For some reason the name(s) of the police officer(s) have been removed and replaced with (named sworn member).  The Calgary police and the RCMP have no problem publishing Mr Kelly's name.  I would think that this case may end up being a great embarrassment for the Calgary Police Service.  I would like to see the names. Lots of time for embarrassment later.

I have notice that none of the news articles include Mr Kelly's website address and not one word about the missing money.   Is Mr Kelly the only one concerned about this? A letter dated March 19, 2004 posted at http://www.minorsoccer.com/BuchananBarryMar19-04.pdf and http://www.minorsoccer.com/BuchananBarryAug31-04.pdf detail serious problems.

Mr Kelly is also saying that there is $421,080.00 missing from a ATM at the soccer centre. If this is true then why would Mr Kelly be having a problem with a police service investigating?

Police Chief Rick Hanson said: "The lengthy ordeal and investigation took a toll on many officers who were named on the website"

RCMP Supt. Randy McGinnis said: "What makes Kelly's site libellous, said McGinnis, are the false allegations made against two city homicide investigators."

Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Website+operator+pushed+free+speech+Calgary+police/3543582/story.html?cid=megadrop_story#ixzz12Aqy5EmJ

"Kelly was also charged with obstructing a peace officer in the execution of his duty by interfering with potential witnesses in a homicide investigation.
A special prosecutor has been appointed and has been working with the RCMP investigators, who are handling the case so that it is kept at arm's length from the Calgary Police Service, officials said."

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2010/09/17/calgary-rcmp-police-libel-website-kelly.html#ixzz12AvwjRHG

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2010/09/17/calgary-rcmp-police-libel-website-kelly.html#ixzz12AvQUg3h

Kevin Brookwell, a spokesman for the Calgary Police Service, said people have a right to state their opinions about police, but there are limits to what they can say.

 "You can't hide in cyberspace and make comments or allegations when they cross that line where they are starting to interfere with criminal investigations," Brookwell said.

"He had to be held accountable. That is where the line in the sand was drawn and that is where these charges are resulting from."     http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20100917/libel-charges-100917/

So the charges have nothing to do with Mr Kelly's former complaints about missing money or the RCMP and Calgary Police officers involved with the investigation or lack of a investigation, or the RCMP and Calgary Police Officers involved with the Calgary soccer centre or The Calgary Soccer Federation - The Bowness Community Association - The Rosscarrock Community Association.

As stated above the charges are because Mr Kelly started interfering with a ongoing criminal investigation.   The information:

Count #5
Between the 1st day of June, A.D. 2008 and the 18th day of February, A.D. 2010, at or near Calgary, in the Province of Alberta, did willfully obstruct (named sworn member), a peace officer for the City of Calgary Police Service, in the execution of his duty, by interfering with potential witnesses, contrary to Section 129(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada.

If I am reading this right Mr Kelly was wilfully obstructing a Calgary police officer for a full twenty-one (21) months before he was charged.

The other counts are publishing defamatory libel and are dated the same. Between the 1st day of November, A.D. 2009 and the 4th day of September, A.D. 2010.

The other counts the wording is similar, count 1 and 2.  "did publish defamatory libel"  Section 300 of the Criminal Code of Canada.

Count 3 and 4: "did publish a defamatory libel" Section 301 of the Criminal Code of Canada

I have no idea why the names of the two city homicide investigators are not being published. Are they undercover?  I am assuming that nothing else on Mr Kelly's site is under investigation apart from what he has said about these two homicide investigators.

Why not request that the names of these officers on the web site be changed to (named sworn member). I am interested in reading what Mr Kelly has to say about the missing money and the cover-up.

A special prosecutor has been appointed. Who appointed this special prosecutor? Why is a special prosecutor needed? Is the specialty cover-up? Is a special judge going to be appointed?

There are going to be a lot more questions asked about this case. 

The Calgary Police officers involved in R v. John Kelly are Detective Reid MERCER and Detective Spencer FRIZZELL.

The online website Rural Crime Watch Association is posting information about R v. Kelly.

WEB SITE MAKES FALSE STATEMENTS AGAINSTS CALGARY POLICE...JOHN KELLY ARRESTED. 2010 SEP 16 Calgary, Alberta

Talk about defamatory libel. The Rural Crime Watch website is not judge and jury. I have read John Kelly's website. Most people will only bother to read the above Rural Crime Watch headline. The Rural Crime Watch website published five counts that Mr John Kelly was charged with. The names of the police officers were changed to (named sworn member). 

The Rural Crime Watch website is saying that the RCMP investigation commenced in March, 2010 and "has centered around a male individual who is alleged to have created and operated a website which makes false statements against two Calgary Police Service members."

I do not know when Mr Kelly created his website. I do know it was before March, 2010. A quick look at Mr. Kelly's website I found a post dated March 20th, 2009.  The dates on the charges are, "Between the 1st day of November, A.D. 2009".

What John Kelly has had to say on his website before the 1st day of November, A.D. 2009 about the Calgary Police Service , The Calgary Soccer Federation - The Bowness Community Association - The Rosscarrock Community Association must be true as the charges have nothing to do with that information or the named people on his website that he says are involved.  If it is true then I can see why people would want to shutdown his website. 

The charges are: "did publish defamatory libel, knowing that it was false, by setting up an Internet website" and "did publish a defamatory libel, by setting up an Internet website". 

The police officers names have been published on what must be the official Alberta Crown information website, Rural Crime Watch Association.  It looks more like a propaganda site but as far as I know it is the only way of getting any information from the Crown about this case.  The officers are Detective Reid MERCER and Detective Spencer FRIZZELL.

Anyone who feels they have information about the actions of these two police detectives are invited to contact Star Chamber Proceedings at starchamberproceedings@gmail.com.

Wake up Calgary

November 8, 2010

The citizens of Saskatoon made a serious mistake by staying silent when a now disgraced Saskatoon Police Officer, Brian Dueck, with the help of a crazy Crown prosecutor started charging innocent people with ritually abusing children.   The well documented cover-up reaching as far as the Supreme Court of Canada cost the good citizens of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon millions. Just like Calgary the local media stayed silent until the CBC Fifth Estate exposed the embarrassing truth of what happened to the Ross children, their parents, Richard Klassen and his extended family in Saskatoon. The Saskatoon police and Crown used the same tactics, as the news media and police in Calgary are doing in the R v. John Kelly farce.  Don’t listen to him, he’s crazy.

continued from home page

Wake up Calgary

It does not take long to read the information posted at Alberta Justice.ca.  I think anyone who reads about the money missing from the ATM, along with the supporting documents posted would have some questions about what is going on within the Calgary police Service.  Do not expect anyone in the administration of justice to stop this injustice.  The most powerful judges in Saskatchewan were involved in the ritual abuse scandal in Saskatchewan.  The silence of the honest judges of The Court of Queens Bench in Saskatoon will forever bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

The people of Calgary are being scammed by the Calgary Police Service. The Crown is knowingly delaying the case by withholding documents and withholding the details of the charges. Mr Kelly can not defend himself.  This is nothing more then a way for the Calgary Police Service to shut up Mr Kelly about the missing money from the ATM at the Soccer Centre.  

The cops seem to be having a difficult time finding anyone to help them in Calgary. What is it to date, three or is it four special prosecutors from Edmonton. A Provincial Court Judge, E.W. Peterson, from Lethbridge.  Every province has their judges easily duped into signing Search Warrants to protect the public image of the administration of justice.

This case needs to end, not with a stay of proceedings but a withdrawing of all the charges. There needs to be a investigation into the missing money and the involvement of the Calgary Police Service in the theft and/or cover-up.

Updates R  v. John Kelly

 

November 20, 2010

R v. John Kelly

The R v. John Kelly case in Calgary is looking like a case of cops lacking the ability to properly investigate the loss of thousands of dollars from several non-profit organizations operating within the City of Calgary. After reading the information it looks like there are no rules or regulations governing these non-profits, or the cops.

Continued from home page:

John Kelly has for years been trying to get someone to investigate the theft of this money by posting the details on his web sites.  The letters from Buchanan Berry LLP - Chartered Accountants and the other supporting information and documents Mr Kelly has posted about the Calgary Soccer Federation would leave one thinking that these non-profits are nothing more then a cash-cow for the people in charge. After reading the documents and warnings from the chartered accountants it is clear that there was no accountability for any of the separate departments.  Thieves protecting thieves ensured a non-profit with losses paid for by taxes and volunteers.

A great number of the volunteers across Canada are police officers and professionals helping their communities. The failure of the Calgary police to investigate thousand of dollars stolen from the non-profits in Calgary would raise the question: - is this the tip of the iceberg, how many other non-profits are being run into the ground by thieves involved with Canadian  Soccer across Canada.

The Section 129(a) and Section 264(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada charges are clearly bogus and manufactured by the Calgary Police.  The KVELLO V. MIAZGA judgement protects the prosecutors, they can do as they please including malicious prosecution.  The Calgary police have nothing to worry about as it is the RCMP claim to have investigated for over a year before charging John Kelly. The RCMP are being coned into another embarrassment.

November 28, 2010                                R v John Kelly

I wonder why?
 
Who is in charge of justice in Alberta? Calgary City Police officers and corrupt Crown prosecutors? Who swore the information resulting in the defamatory libel charges against John Kelly and how many times has this person perjured themselves in the past?  Rubber stamp justice. 

It looks like the Crown has received some advice from someone with some legal training as Mr Kelly has been informed that the charges are going to be withdrawn and replaced with charges that have nothing to do with defamatory libel. Is the same person going to sign the new information and be guilty of swearing falsely again? Will the Crown have to go on another fishing trip to the City of Lethbridge? 

This has cleared up the reason for the gag order and the slander directed at John Kelly.   Its about the missing money and a corrupt Calgary Police Service that Mr Kelly has been posting about. This is a case of shut Mr Kelly up. 

If the Crown proceeded with the defamatory libel charges the information on Mr Kelly's websites would have been an issue at trial. The trial could have exposed who the thieves are.  Could it be that the Calgary Police know who stole the money and have screwed up the investigation and a murder investigation.  The R v John Kelly case is another screw-up and someone needs to stop these justice idiots from continuing with their unlawful persecution of John Kelly. 

I am assuming that a judge heard the Crown say they were going to withdraw the defamatory libel charges and replace the charges with some other charges where the stolen money and police officer corruption exposed by Mr Kelly on his web sites would not be an issue.   I think this judge has placed the administration of justice into disrepute in the eyes of the public. I forgot, the court has gagged the press and Mr Kelly so the public has no way of knowing what the court, police and Crown is doing.  I wonder why?

Search Star Chamber Proceedings

Search This Site and all related sites