A short sound clip of the evidence in the Ross, Ross & White case. Three people were found guilty? Saskatoon Police Officer, Brian Dueck, is dictating the evidence. What you will hear is all the more incredible when one realises that the social workers, police officers, judges (Ross, Ross & White) prosecutors, doctors, editors and thousands of Saskatoon citizens believed every word.
The Supreme Court and the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal judges are falsely claiming that there was evidence that the children’s parents were guilty. This is being done to keep the public from finding out that the Saskatchewan courts and Saskatchewan Justice were in the control of a pack of religious nut cases.
Dueck is dictating the charges against all the defendants on the tape, including some of the children of the defendants. There was no evidence, the same as the Richard Klassen case.
With no more court cases people can write their books and start making the movies.
Most of the comments on the news articles posted on the internet are very positive, well written and encouraging. One would assume that they are being posted by lawyers. Its about time. Where have you been for all those years? Saskatoon will be famous as being the home of the stupidest pack of judicial fools in Canadian history. All those documents and tapes that they withheld can now be published.
The hardest part of making a move will be choosing actors for the part of a Saskatoon judge and two Saskatchewan Court of Appeal judges. No one will find what they did funny, the reason why they did it would call for Larry, Moe and Curly.
Matthew Miazga v. Estate of Dennis Kvello
The decision from the Supreme Court of Canada is as unbelievable as were the first charges against the Ross children’s parents. I can understand that some of the new judges may not have the past history of the case and all the related cases that have been heard by the Supreme Court over the years. After reading the first paragraph of the decision it looks like these judges are lying. The Chief Justice knows the information is not true. The court is taking advantage of Canadians lack of knowledge of the case. The Canadian media knows the truth and cannot continue to stay silent now that no one can say, “no comment as it‘s before the courts“.
If you are a RCMP officer, or Brian Dueck, a former disgraced Saskatoon police officer the court will allow you to knowingly lie under oath in a court of law. We are now going to allow the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada to knowingly lie to Canadians. Are hockey players the only ones not allowed to lie in a Canadian Court room?
The decision is a mockery of justice. The decision has nothing to do with any of the people involved except the Ross children. There is no justice for anyone when the court manipulates the evidence to protect itself from embarrassment. Keep the public from finding out the truth about what happened to the Ross children in Saskatchewan. What the courts and administration of justice did to these children is sick and perverted along with the people responsible. Miazga is not, and never was one of them.
Matthew Miazga was a victim just like the Ross children, Johanna Lucas, Richard Klassen and his family, Dennis Kvello and his family, Donald Leo Ross, Helen Susan Ross and Donald George White.
I have been reading a book review by Professor Emeritus Howard McConnell, College of Law, University of Saskatchewan. It is posted on justicehrabinsky.com
KELSEN’S CODA THE BATTLE BETWEEN WILL & LOGIC W. H. McCONNELL Reprinted from Saskatchewan Law Review 1992 - Vol. 56(1)
Mr McConnell wrote this review during the time Saskatchewan Justice was involved in the cover-up of the satanic ritual child abuse cases in Saskatchewan. There is a picture below of the professor holding pamphlets that were being distributed to the public by people concerned about injustice, the Ross children and judicial corruption. Mr McConnell is standing on the left side of one of the pictures taken at the get-out-of-jail party for John Lucas. It was no secret that Mr McConnell was disturbed that some of his former students were involved in the cover-up.
I like most Canadians would find a legal document that is only understood by a lawyer related to a basic norm, or grundnorm, General Theory of Norms, pure theory of law and jurisprudential theory impossible to read and understand. I was pleasantly surprised when I started to read that Mr McConnell had written in a style that is very understandable. He included examples that explained in very basic language what he was saying.
I at first thought his writing style was for the benefit of his former students, he would have had to dumb it down for them to understand. Mr McConnell was a highly educated lawyer. His writing style does not only authenticate this, he was a teacher. I believe what he was saying was known within the legal community. Saskatchewan Justice is corrupt.
There is nothing that confirms this better then the May 30th slanderous garbage decision written by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal , regarding Q.B. 271 of 1994, KVELLO V. MIAZGA.
Deny, Deny, Deny
There are only two options, order a new trial, or resign from the court. They need to do something before everyone dies waiting for the three fools to embarrass themselves again.
A Backwoods Society
The Kvello v Miazga judgement three years ago not only placed the administration of justice in Saskatchewan into disrepute, it places the people of Canada into disrepute around the world. A backwoods society unwilling and powerless to protect its children.
The judgement is a look at what can go wrong when people ignore the obvious. Saskatchewan Justice and Social Services were in the control of religious extremists. Mentally ill Christians are usually held over by the authorities for a sic examination when they start ranting about the devil, brood mares, satanic ritual sacrifices, and barbecuing babies. Not in Saskatchewan. They are the authorities, and will appeal.
People are Talking
Kvello v. Miazga Appeal People are Talking
Another story going around about the delay in the written judgement of the KVELLO V. MIAZGA appeal.
The Baynton judgement confirmed that the Ross, Ross & White Appeal and the R v. John & Johanna Lucas Appeal were travesties of justice, a great embarrassment for the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and made the judges of The Supreme Court of Canada out to be fools.
The story going around is that all three judges are refusing to write the reasons for judgement. They all want to concur. I don’t think it matters. They will be doing their best not to embarrass themselves again. With the documented past travesties of justice from this court it does not matter who writes the reasons for judgement, the Court has no credibility.
The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal will not make a decision in the KVELLO V. MIAZGA case until after the return of Jesus Christ.
The KVELLO V. MIAZGA appeal is another travesty of justice in the making.
The StarPhoenix reported: “Holgate said Bunko-Ruys was involved with the case from the very start, but he came under sharp questioning from Justice Nicholas Sherstobitoff over where the evidence was to support that contention. “
I have typed out and posted some of the transcript of the Ross, Ross, & White preliminary hearing and the trial before Madam Justice Batten. What Mr Holgate said at the appeal was true. Carol Bunko-Ruys was involved from the very start. She was involved years before any court proceedings.
It took the Court of Appeal 17 months to hatch a strategy in the Ross, Ross & White written judgement. The only way out of the witch hunt was a descending judgement and the Supreme Court of Canada. The gag orders and sealing documents was not enough. “ A stay of proceedings is as good as it gets in Saskatchewan”.
The only way out this time around is a new trial, or a public inquiry into all the ritual satanic child abuse cases and related cases in Saskatchewan. Its not the fact that Saskatchewan justice and Social Services went on witch hunts in Saskatchewan, its the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal that is the bigger embarrassment for the people of Saskatchewan.
Religious hysterias are nothing more then a means to deceive gullible people. The satanic ritual child abuse hysteria in Saskatoon was the work of sick minds. Saskatchewan justice engaged in a cover-up involving years of gag orders, withholding government documents, sealing documents, persecuting and jailing innocent people in corrupt court proceedings.
Any court case in Saskatchewan involving religion will have the same judges hearing the cases. An appeal may as well be made directly to the Knights of Columbus at MacPherson Leslie & Tyerman. The people of Saskatchewan would have a better chance at receiving justice if they had appealed directly to the Pope. Padding the court of appeal with a so called same sex marriage expert and crossing fingers in hopes of a appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada was arrogant and lame.
Gullible religious fools do not make good judges, or case law.
Kvello v. Miazga Appeal
I started wondering what the hell the judges were talking about at paragraph 6.
[6] Second, an important aspect of this case is that the sexual abuse of the children took place in the late 1980’s and the early 1990’s, and the criminal proceedings arising from the abuse took place from 1991 to 1993.
Where is the evidence? There is no evidence of sexual abuse of the Ross children by anyone charged. The confession and conviction of Peter Klassen made under duress does not make it true. All three of the Ross children stated that no one sexually abused them, before any charges were laid. It was only after being placed into the care of crazy religious satanic panic fools that the children started making allegations of ritual abuse.
[32] The [R.] parents and D.W. brought an appeal against their convictions to this Court. The appeal was dismissed on May 10, 1995 [(1995), 98 C.C.C. (3d) 353]. On a further appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, the convictions were set aside [[1996] 2 S.C.R. 291]. The case against D.W. was dismissed, and a new trial was ordered with respect to the [R.] parents. The Crown elected to proceed no further.
The fact that the Crown did not proceed with a new trial does not make the parents of the Ross children guilty of sexually abusing their children.
[137] Miazga led evidence that he was encouraged to proceed by the judge presiding at the preliminary inquiry, and by colleagues and some superiors after discussing his doubts about the children’s credibility. However, Proulx held, at para. 33, that a prosecutor cannot rely on consultations that he had with his colleagues and superiors, because he obviously knew much more about the case than they did, and, as the holder of an important office under the Criminal Code, the decision to proceed with the charges was his and his alone.
There must be a appeal by Mr Miazga. What could he do? How could he defy the instructions of a judge and his superiors? Mr Miazga did not know much more about the case than his superiors. His superiors were the ones withholding documents from the defence and Mr Miazga. It was Mr Miazga’s colleagues and superiors that left the Ross twins in the Thompson foster home to be raped by their brother for four years, not Mr Miazga. It was Mr Miazga’s colleagues and superiors that withheld documents and evidence at the trial of Johanna and John Lucas and the Supreme Court of Canada. I have read the transcripts. Mr Miazga, like many others overcome by the satanic panic soon realised, based on common sense there was no bases for the charges. Had Mr Miazga been told the truth about what was happening to the Ross twins and their brother in the Thompson foster home he would have removed them to safety. It was his colleagues and superiors that manipulated the Ross children and manufactured a false case of ritual satanic child abuse against the Ross children’s parents.
[149] These children were born into a dysfunctional home. The parents were both deaf mutes and alcoholics. The mother was a prostitute who regularly brought her customers home. The three children were neglected and sexually abused. In due course, [M.R. 1] began sexually abusing his two sisters. The children were apprehended by the Department of Social Services in February of 1987 and were placed in a foster home operated by the respondents, Dale and Anita Klassen.
The judges of the Court of Appeal, the news media and the Judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench over the years seem to think that mud & innuendo can replace fact. We all know that Helen Ross was not the best mother to her children, that does not make her a child molester.
[255] The preliminary inquiries resulted in the committal to stand trial of the charges in the [R.] matter and in the Klassen-Kvello matter. In both cases the evidence of the three [R.] children was the evidence on which the allegations of sexual abuse was founded. The preliminary trial judge found there was sufficient evidence to go to trial. Even though he is not required to make findings of credibility, all parties were committed to stand trial. More importantly, the same three children testified at the [R.] trial in the Court of Queen’s Bench. Their evidence was accepted as credible by a very experienced trial judge, indeed a former Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench. All three defendants were convicted and that conviction was upheld by a majority of this Court. As noted, the majority decided there was evidence before the trial judge on which she could have found the applicants guilty and as a result she committed no reversible error. The Supreme Court of Canada subsequently quashed the convictions and ordered a new trial. The Supreme Court of Canada did not order an acquittal of all the defendants but rather returned the matter to the Court of Queen’s Bench for a new trial. One can deduce from all this there was at least some credible evidence from which one could reasonably infer that there was reasonable and probable cause.
Reasonable and probable cause? Based on what? An experienced judge, a former Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench. Justice Paul Hrabinsky is a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench. Why was the public and the news media banned from the court room. Why did the chief justice seal the transcripts and the judges order shortly after the trial? It was to protect the children? Hogwash. This is what Mr Justice Baynton had to say about that crap.
[16] In fairness to them, neither a child therapist, a police officer nor a prosecutor has the power to remove children from foster homes or to place them in other foster care homes. That power is held by Social Services personnel who have the legal power and responsibility for child protection issues. But it is reprehensible that they took no meaningful action to have [M.R. 1] and the girls placed in separate foster homes to prevent further incidents of sexual abuse.
[256] I am well aware of the comments of Justices Iacobucci and Binnie in Proulx that the prosecutor cannot bootstrap his own position on the basis of flawed court decisions that were “swept away by the acquittal directed by the Court of Appeal.” Here, we do not have an acquittal “swept away by the Court of Appeal.” We have an order for a new trial directed by the Supreme Court. Surely one has to read the comments in para. 32 of Proulx in the context of that decision, which was one of the most egregious acts of prosecutorial misuse of office where there was a clear absence of reasonable and probable cause in which the judgment was swept away on appeal. Here we have just the opposite. This is not bootstrapping. This is an indication of reasonable and probable cause.
Again with the reasonable and probable cause. This is crap and everyone knows it. The bases for reasonable and probable cause can not be a conviction in a court overcome by a religious hysteria and a cover-up by the judges of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. That is flawed logic. We might as well do away with the Supreme Court of Canada. Had the judges all agreed with the descending judgement of The Honourable Mr. Justice Vancise at the Ross, Ross & White appeal the public would have been demanding a public inquiry. Had Saskatchewan Justice not presented a bogus case before the Supreme Court of Canada there would have been a acquittal of all the appellants and the public would have been demanding a public inquiry. Saskatchewan Justice presented a further bogus case to the Supreme Court of Canada, they withheld documents and evidence from the court at the Johanna Lucas appeal. These were the same government documents entered as evidence before Justice Baynton resulting in a finding of malicious prosecution against Brian Dueck. Had Saskatchewan Justice not lied and deceived the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada, Johanna and John Lucas would have been acquitted of defaming Brian Dueck, the public would have been demanding a public inquiry and Brian Dueck would have been charged. The fact that the public has been asking for a public inquiry for over 16 years continues to be ignored by the Government of Saskatchewan.
[257] In the circumstances of this case, where Miazga had successfully prosecuted the [R.] parents, did the prosecutor have before him facts that pointed so overwhelmingly to the respondents’ innocence that no reasonable person could have believed in the respondents’ guilt? I don’t think so.
“reasonable person”?
“If you tell a lie long enough, it becomes the truth." --Joseph Goebbe ... lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. ...
Tell the Ross children that Saskatchewan Justice saved them from a satanic cult. That is what the court is asking us to believe. The media needs to find and interview the Ross children. If not for John Lucas, Johanna Lucas, Sheila Steele, injusticebusters.com and Richard Klassen’s fight for justice the public would not have heard the truth. The media and child therapists were busy cashing in on Saskatchewan Justice and Social Services self created scandal of sex with children.
As for the children being sexually perverted. Tell that to Dr. Natalie Novick Brown a clinical psychologist and sexual deviancy counsellor with the University of Washington's Fetal Alcohol and Drug Unit in Seattle.
Saskatchewan Justice has been treating the Saskatchewan public and media like a mushroom. Sit us all in a dark corner and feed us an endless supply of bullshit. Hellen Ross never sexually abused any of her children.
Kvello v. Miazga Appeal: Paragraph 7: More Crap
[7] Third, it must also be borne in mind that the trial of the action giving rise to this appeal took place during the year 2002, a full ten years after the conclusion of the events giving rise to the action. As a result, many witnesses had difficulty remembering things that had not been recorded, but which had a significant bearing on the outcome of the action.
What had a bearing on the outcome of the action has nothing to do with memory loss over ten years. It has more to do with serious criminal code violations by the people who experienced convenient memory loss during the Baynton trial and others who hid behind the law. The Thompsons did not testify. Social Workers did not testify. The charges were bases on disclosures the children made to the Thompson foster parents. Notes were kept that detailed the alleged abuse of the Ross children. There were 73 references to “Thompson” in the Baynton Judgement. Paragraph 67 - 50 - 51 - 433 Baynton Judgement
[67] The present whereabouts of the Thompsons is unknown to the parties. Dueck testified that he had police services attempt to locate them without success, but I have reservations about the legitimacy of those attempts. The nature of these initial "disclosures" of the [R.] children and the manner in which they were made or obtained is, especially in the unique circumstances of this case, of critical importance. It has a significant bearing on the legitimacy of the investigation, the charges and the prosecutions. It was also of critical importance to the defence of all 16 individuals charged with the criminal offences. It has a significant bearing as well on the determination of issues raised by this civil case. Accordingly, the evidence of the Thompsons, tested by cross-examination, would have been of considerable assistance to me. Later on, I will relate how the potential evidence of the Thompsons in this regard was in the main kept from the scrutiny of defence counsel and the court on the basis of Miazga's objections.
Difficulties with the Evidence
[50] The facts that I relate in this judgment involve in part the actions of various Social Services workers, personnel and officials. None of them testified in the case before me. The testimony of even one of these individuals would have been helpful in clarifying many of the material issues in dispute. Section 73 of The Child and Family Services Act, S.S. 1989-90, c. C-7.2, provides these individuals with very broad protections from being compelled to appear and give evidence in a court of law. The benefit of those protections was relied upon by Social Services in applying to quash a subpoena issued at the request of the plaintiffs against one of the senior workers. An agreement was reached however respecting the application and a letter was provided by the worker that clarified the issue in question.
[51] As well, most of the parties and the witnesses who testified at the civil trial or who gave evidence at their respective examinations for discovery, understandably had considerable difficulty recalling specific details of dates, conversations, motives, thought processes and like matters that pertained to events that took place well over a decade ago. But I was not impressed by the inability of some of these individuals to recall even memorable and significant events. In many instances it was obvious that some of the witnesses, particularly Dueck and Miazga, were reluctant to testify about or acknowledge such events. I am not satisfied that the professed lack of recall was always genuine. In other instances, admissions against interest had to be laboriously extracted from the defendants and other witnesses through lengthy cross-examination and by reference to uncontroverted documentary evidence. This process considerably lengthened the trial.
[433] Third, this evidence was introduced through the testimony of the two prosecutors on the basis of an exception to the hearsay rule. The statement was tendered as proof that it was made, not as proof of its truthfulness. Hansen and Miazga invited the judge out to lunch after the two preliminary inquires had been concluded but before the [R.], [R.] and White trial was to begin. I place little reliance on the alleged statement of the judge for four reasons. First, it is not the best evidence but is only second-hand evidence. The judge was not called as a witness to affirm or deny the statement attributed to him. The plaintiffs were not able to cross-examine him about his alleged statement, the context in which it was given or whether it was made with qualifications.
Paragraph 169 - Kvello v. Miazga Appeal
“The trial judge was certainly correct when he stated that the judgment was more like a report of a public inquiry than a judgment.
Had there been a full public inquiry they would not have been able to avoid testifying.
Lack of recall remarkable The StarPhoenix editorial Friday, September 19, 2003
By any measure, the allegations by at least three children that led to dozens of horrendous sex abuse charges against 16 adults in 1991-92 in Saskatchewan were bizarre enough to warrant the moniker "scandal of the century" and stick in the minds of most persons.
Even though it took some time for their testimony to become known -- it was proffered in a courtroom closed to the public and media and arranged to prevent the accused directly from facing the children -- it was of a shocking nature rarely heard in a Canadian court. The horrors the children claimed to have experienced or witnessed ranged from being forced to have sex with the adults to engaging in sex acts with bat-like creatures and eating eyeballs and drinking blood to seeing human babies killed and eaten.
Among those charged were the biological parents of the three children, along with the mother's 68-year-old boyfriend whom the kids called "grandpa." While all three were found guilty, a StarPhoenix investigation at the time that involved "grandpa" taking a lie detector test raised serious doubts about the circumstances surrounding the conviction. The man eventually was exonerated by the Supreme Court, while the Crown didn't proceed with retrials ordered for the parents.
Others charged in the case came from foster families and others related to the families in whose care the children were placed upon removal from the parental home. The foster families weren't told of the children's background and inherited a huge problem that included the eldest child, a boy then 13, sexually abusing his twin 10-year-old female siblings.
Of the 13 foster-family persons charged, only one, a man with a previous record of abusing kids, pleaded guilty to four charges in a plea bargain that saw charges against the others stayed. The children have since admitted to fabricating their story and 12 adults wrongly charged are suing Justice officials for malicious prosecution.
Retired Crown prosecutor Terry Hinz testified Thursday that he refused to take the case against the foster family because the police work was incomplete but that colleagues proceeded with it because of "political pressure" from Regina to take it at least to a preliminary inquiry.
While the lawsuit by the extended foster family, the Klassens et al, is serving to jog the memory of many Saskatchewan residents who'd read or heard details involving the original charges, it appears that this group doesn't include the person whose job it was to supervise Saskatchewan's Crown prosecutors at the time.
Ellen Gunn, now a justice of the Court of Queen's Bench, made an unusual appearance in the witness box and testified that she has no memory about the sex abuse case when she was questioned by Richard Klassen, who is representing himself in the lawsuit.
Coming from someone whose current position as a senior court justice of more than 11 years and whose former position as executive director of provincial prosecutions attest to her substantial intellectual capabilities, the total lack of recall about this case seems odd.
She doesn't remember seeing the file in 1991 in a high-profile case that featured, among other things, child sex abuse allegations involving about 36 adults (20 persons implicated by the children weren't charged), that suggested satanic ritual abuse and that involved allegations of dozens of horrific acts of degradation visited upon children.
Time and again, she told Klassen she couldn't recall details of two conversations she had with Crown prosecutor Matt Miazga about the case, beyond her cryptic notes that were limited to: "re: sex abuse charges -- foster parents."
"I have no memory of the conversations which led to those notes being made, and I have no other memory of having any information about the case."
It wasn't clear whether the person responsible for directing Crown prosecutors at the time couldn't recall the details because she had forgotten what Miazga told her or whether it was because she'd left the call on prosecution entirely up to him and delved no deeper than to ascertain he was making a plea bargain in a case that involved sex abuse charges against foster parents.
Meanwhile, just a stone's throw away, a parade of witnesses ranging from a grieving mother to a man with alcohol abuse problems to medical professionals and others are having far less difficulty giving detailed accounts of events surrounding the freezing death of a Native youth 13 years ago.
Kvello v. Miazga Appeal: Paragraph 146 - 239: More Crap
[239] The trial judge notes no explanation was ever given as to why seminars dealing with satanic abuse and sexual abuse were held in Saskatoon and then theorizes about the reason without any evidence. ---
One of the seminars dealing with satanic abuse was paid for by Saskatchewan Social Services. Why seminars dealing with satanic abuse and sexual abuse were held in Saskatoon is a question that should have been asked the social workers and their supervisors at the trial. This could not be done because they refused to testify. Justice Baynton was left to theorize about the reason based on the evidence before him.
[146] The changes in the Criminal Code 3 and the Canada Evidence Act 4 removing the need for corroboration of the unsworn evidence of children to obtain a conviction occurred in January of 1988. A great deal of pressure was placed on the police and law enforcement agencies to protect children from sexual abuse. There was also at that time a prevailing and pervasive doctrine that “children don’t lie - they can’t make these allegations up.” Though we now know this is and was false. A number of psychologists however advanced this as gospel. It was a cottage industry, they cashed in and caused incalculable harm.
Blame this travesty of justice on a change in the Criminal Code and Canada Evidence Act. Hogwash. A judge anywhere in Canada after hearing what the Ross children were saying would have ordered a sic examine for the adult who corroborated their story of ritual abuse. Judges in Saskatchewan were overcome by the hysteria along with Dueck, social workers and their superiors. What else could explain the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal upholding the Ross children’s parents conviction. What else could explain the persecution and jailing of Johanna Lucas.
Kvello v. Miazga Appeal: Paragraph 255
[255] The preliminary inquiries resulted in the committal to stand trial of the charges in the [R.] matter and in the Klassen-Kvello matter. In both cases the evidence of the three [R.] children was the evidence on which the allegations of sexual abuse was founded. The preliminary trial judge found there was sufficient evidence to go to trial. Even though he is not required to make findings of credibility, all parties were committed to stand trial. More importantly, the same three children testified at the [R.] trial in the Court of Queen’s Bench. Their evidence was accepted as credible by a very experienced trial judge, indeed a former Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench. All three defendants were convicted and that conviction was upheld by a majority of this Court. As noted, the majority decided there was evidence before the trial judge on which she could have found the applicants guilty and as a result she committed no reversible error. The Supreme Court of Canada subsequently quashed the convictions and ordered a new trial. The Supreme Court of Canada did not order an acquittal of all the defendants but rather returned the matter to the Court of Queen’s Bench for a new trial. One can deduce from all this there was at least some credible evidence from which one could reasonably infer that there was reasonable and probable cause.
One can also deduce that there was credible evidence that there was reasonable and probable cause that the parents were also innocent as the Supreme Court dismissed the case against Donald White.
If Miazga appeals to the Supreme Court, a new trial is ordered, and not proceeded with, would Miazga be innocent? If the finding against Carol Bunko-Ruys is appealed, a new trial ordered and not proceeded with, would this make her guilty. Someone, please ask these judges to retire.
KVELLO V. MIAZGA: Paragraph 228
[228] The trial judge concludes that all of these “concessions” were exacted from the courts and that the prosecutors deliberately overplayed the trauma of the children to focus the criminal proceedings on the needs of the children rather than on the validity of the allegations. Surely one must ask where were the courts in all of this? Didn’t the preliminary court judge and the trial judge in the [R.] trial have a role in this? Surely the very experienced trial judge was capable of saying, I’m going to decide how the trial is conducted?
The courts were caught up in the hysteria just like Brian Dueck. Brian Dueck signed the information but he was not in charge of the investigation. Evidence at the trial was that a baby had been sacrificed, skinned, de-boned and the remains buried in a back yard in Saskatoon. A police officer on receiving information that a baby had been murdered and buried would have started digging. Brian Dueck knew there was no murdered baby buried and so did the judge. Mr Dueck was asked by one of the defence lawyers why he did not dig up the backyard. He told the court that the experts told him he would not find the baby remains. One of the so called experts on cults and ritual abuse was Colin Clay, the Chaplin at the University of Saskatchewan. Surely one must ask what part did the religious extremists have to do with this travesty of justice?
A hand full of religious extremists within Saskatchewan Justice and Social Services took charge of the investigation and prosecution. Their fascination with the experts self created scandal of sex with children left them with no way out once it proceeded to a preliminary hearing. They were out to educate the public and the court about their sick fascinations of ritual abuse and sex with children. Surely one must ask what part did the news media play in all this?
The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal relies on the publics lack of knowledge about the first preliminary hearing and trial where the Ross children’s parents and a friend were found guilty. This was the first malicious prosecution involving ritual child abuse in Saskatchewan. After reading the incredible written judgement from the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal surely one must ask what part did the judges of the Court of Appeal play in all this?
After all these years the judges of the Court of Appeal continue to justify and add credibility to the ritual child abuse cases in Saskatchewan by way of lies and slander.
Lies and Slander
The judges of the Court of Appeal would have the public believe that it was the lies of the Ross children that resulted in the satanic panic.
The government of Saskatchewan continues to use the courts to slander the Ross children. The children are constantly called liars and sexually perverted.
It was not the lies of the Ross children that created the satanic panic. The court would have us believe the Ross children made up the stories about sacrificing babies and eating them. The satanic panic started in 1980 with the first SRA survivor book, called "Michelle Remembers". The Ross children were not born yet.
Other books followed, "Satan's Underground" and "He Came to Set the Captives Free" promoted the Fundamentalist Christians Satanic Ritual Abuse movement. The Committee Against Ritual Abuse of Children was started by Rev. Colin Clay in Saskatoon. Saskatchewan Social Services funded a seminar by Dr Contie , Washington State University in 1989. The satanic panic and the incredible stories told by the Ross children started before they were apprehended by Social Services. Not only did the Ross children not create the stories about ritual abuse, they did not create the stories of being sexually abused. The non-existent abuse was implanted by Brian Dueck, Dr Contie, Rev. Colin Clay, Social Services and Saskatchewan Justice.
If the Ross children were “sexually perverted” it was a result of the state sponsored rape of the Ross Twins for four years after being placed in the Thompson Special Care Home where they were in the control of sexual perverts who needed the lies of children to promote their self created scandal of sex with children. Clearly the judges have not read the documents. Or is it that they refuse to read the documents so they can promote the lies and slander?
The court room door has been opened by the judges of the Court of Appeal for all three Ross children and their parents to sue for damages. The previous Statements of Claim against the Government of Saskatchewan were defective and flawed. They did not name the judges involved in the cover-up as defendants.
Paragraph 6
“The prohibitions in the Criminal Code and Canada Evidence Act against convictions upon the unsworn evidence of children, unless their evidence was corroborated in a material particular, had just been repealed effective January 1, 1988.”
How is this relevant to the Ritual Child abuses cases in Saskatchewan? The fact that judges and prosecutors in Saskatchewan were unable because of a religious mental defect to distinguish truth from fiction does not mean that the rest of the country needed a story that defied basic common sense corroborated in a material particular.
The Thompson notes kept by the foster parents detailing the incredible ritual abuse about sacrificed and barbequed babies was believed to be true by these nutcases. The notes are what the charges against the Ross children’s parents and the Kvello and Klassen families was based on.
The cover-up by Saskatchewan Justice and the judges of the Saskatchewan Courts has left many wondering if the angry outbursts and rants from these lying judges over the years has result in a mental defect. Maybe a soft thump on the back of the head with a bible would help.
This is BS and the judges know it.
Paragraph 8. “ Eventually, the boy was sexually abusing the girls.”
The twins older brother at 10 months old was seen at the Alvin Buckwold Centre at which time he was somewhat developmentally delayed. At two years old, a psychological assessment he presented with a very short attention span and independent, stubborn and non-compliant behaviour. At 6 years old a psychological assessment was attempted but not completed because of lack of attention and cooperation. At age seven he started school. He was "acting out sexually" and demonstrating "inappropriate sexual behaviour" and placed in a special program at school. All three children were apprehended in February of 1987, the foster parents observed them engaging in behaviours of a sexual nature. At age 7 he was found by a babysitter in the foster home inserting a butter knife and liquid soap into his sisters vagina.
“Eventually, the boy was sexually abusing the girls.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Read his Statement of Claim against the Government of Saskatchewan.
Read the Statement of Claim by the Ross Twins. They settled their claim in 2006 for knowing being left to be raped and tortured for four years in the Thompson foster home.
It was not Social Services who tried to help the the twins brother, it was his teachers. They demanded that he get some medical help. He was referred to Dr Reebye on Oct 6, 1987.
Dr Reebye’s recommendations.
Saskatchewan Social Services with the help of Brian Dueck were looking for child victims of their self created ritual abuse scandal. Social Services had a special foster home waiting for its first placement of child victims. In September 1989 Saskatoon Police Corporal Brian Dueck and Lyle and Marilyn Thompson talk with the three children at their school. This interview took place before the twins brother was moved into the Thompson “Special“ Foster Home in December 1989. He was 10 years old.
December 1989 a warning from a child therapist. “Must be supervised at all times. - should not be left alone with small children.” Note: The above copied from court disclosure documents.
In May of 1990 the twins were moved into the Thompsons foster home with their brother. The twins were 8 years old in March, 1990.
The children were in the care and control of sexual perverts. Marilyn Thompson started keeping notes of disclosures of sexual abuse made by the children. The sexual fancies of this group of perverts was documented in 100 pages of her notes. The notes involved group and ritualistic sex with satanic overtones, the sexual abuse and killing of babies and animals, the ingestion of human flesh, feces, urine, blood and other horrible, perverted and incredible acts.
Why have the courts not included any mention of the note one of the Ross twins wrote to her child therapist when she was in the Thompson foster home? Help me, my brother is raping me.
May 25, 1990 Social workers took the twins brother to the Saskatoon police. Brian Dueck was not available and he was interviewed by Corporal Ron Shindell. Multitude of disclosure i.e: large number of people abused him, parents, uncles, aunts, etc. Corporal Shindell considered the disclosures as unbelievable.
Brian Dueck testified this was the fault of Social Services as they did not wait until he was available. After the time at the police station Janet Kormish, Norma Rivard, Sheila Gagna, Jacques St. Pierre, Laura Mainprize and Carol Middleton met to discuss their action from this point.
The self created scandal of sex with children would have to wait until Brian Dueck was available. The rest of the story is documented as the "Scandal of the Century".
Saskatchewan Justice had as many fools working for them as did Social Services. Saskatchewan Justice fools were out to educate the public and the courts about the ritual abuse of children. They succeeded with the malicious prosecution and conviction of the Ross children’s parents and Donald White. Saskatchewan judges then engage in a cover-up by sealing the court documents, the Thompson notes and the taped interviews of the children. When the documents detailing the rape of 8 year old girls in the Thompson foster home were distributed by Johanna and John Lucas they were both malicious prosecuted and jailed.
The Kvello v. Miazga Court of Appeal judgement has more to do with protecting the malicious prosecution judgements of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in the Ross, Ross & White and Johanna and John Lucas cases then with the malicious prosecution of the Kvello and Richard Klassen families. The descending judgement in the Ross, Ross and White and the Kvello v Miazga civil case are nothing more then an attempt by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal to deceive the public.
Blame it all on Brian Dueck, Miazga, the Ross children and Helen Ross. Again the judges of the Court of Appeal have engaged in a abuse of process to protect Saskatchewan courts that knowingly left two 8 year old girls to be raped by their brother until he was over fourteen years old in the Thompson foster home. Judges were bragging all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada about not reading the Thompson notes and viewing the police interview tapes.
This is not credible justification for the courts leaving children to be raped.
A Canadian War Hero.
The Ross children, twins girls aged 5 and their brother aged 8 were apprehended by Saskatchewan Social Services in February of 1987.
The children were placed into the care and control of fundamentalist religious extremists who believed children were being sacrificed by Ritual Satanic Abuse cult members. Sixteen people were charged based on the contents of the Thompson Notes.
The first of the sixteen charged were the children’s parents and a friend of their mother. The friend was a veteran of the second world war. He had the medals of a proud Canadian who served his country by putting his life on the firing line for rights and freedom. He is not a child molester, he is a Canadian war hero. He was acquitted of all charges by The Supreme Court of Canada.
The Rule of Law broke down at the Ross, Ross and White Satanic Ritual Abuse case in Saskatchewan. Saskatchewan Justice gagged and sealed this case from the public. The Appeal to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal was a abuse of the process of law that will go down in Canadian history. The KVELLO V. MIAZGA judgement is a further attempt by The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal to deceive the public and the Supreme Court of Canada by way of another descending junk judgement.
The KVELLO V. MIAZGA judgement is an attempt by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal judges to justify the courts malicious prosecution of a Canadian war hero. Saskatchewan Justice and judges of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, knowing he was not guilty, attempted to deceive the public and the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada. Their attempt failed.
The judges are slandering Donald White. This is not the way to treat a Canadian war veteran.
The court is protecting fundamentalist religious extremists who knowingly left two 8 year old twin girls to be raped in a Saskatchewan foster home for four years.
Why is this Crown prosecutor being allowed to prosecute anyone in a Canadian court room?
Mother pleads guilty to aggravated assault The StarPhoenix Published: Thursday, June 28, 2007
A 28-year-old Neuanlage mother accused of trying to kill her three daughters has pleaded guilty to aggravated assault.
The woman, whose name cannot be published due to a publication ban, was originally charged with attempted murder and administering a noxious substance, in addition to aggravated assault, but Crown prosecutor Matt Miazga decided to stay the former two charges.
Appearing before Judge Timothy White at Beardy's circuit court on June 20, the woman received a conditional sentence. She must complete one year of community service to be followed by two years of probation. The woman was originally scheduled to appear in court on June 27, but her appearance was moved up a week due to scheduling conflicts.
Manny Sonnenschein, the woman's lawyer, said he has known the woman and her husband for some time and they are a "nice family."
The woman's children, aged seven, two and 10 months, are currently in the care of Saskatchewan social services but have seen their mother on several occasions, according to Sonnenschein. "We are aiming to get the children back to their mother at an early occasion," he said.
What do the editors of the Saskatoon StarPhoenix think they are doing?
Are they testing the waters for a reaction from a public that the editors have lied to for over 16 years. This so called newspaper has not missed an opportunity to slander and embarrass the Ross children and the victims of Saskatchewan Justice malicious prosecutions. Put their pictures on the front page when Saskatchewan Justice and cult cops paraded them before the cameras in handcuffs in an attempt to deceive the public by the look on their faces. Look at them, they must be guilty. This excuse for a newspaper has known the truth and has put the sale of newspapers before their duty to protect democracy and the democratic process.
Johanna Lucas and John Lucas were maliciously prosecuted and jailed after trying to help the Ross children who were in the control of religious idiots, cult judges, prosecutors and doctors who left 8 year old twin girls to be raped in a foster home for four years. Not one word about this in the StarPhoenix over the years.
Helen Ross was maliciously prosecuted. There was no evidence before any court in Canada that she in any way abused her children. The judges of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal would not only have the public believe there was evidence that she abused her children, these fools want the public to believe that Helen Ross ritually abused her children. Not one word about this in the StarPhoenix. The KVELLO V. MIAZGA judgement is an outrageous abuse of the process of the court.
The KVELLO V. MIAZGA judgement must be appealed and overturned before Matt Miazga can step foot in a court room. Do the Attorney General and the judges of the Court of Appeal think that they can sacrifice Mr Miazga to protect an administration of justice that knowing left 8 year old children to be raped without an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada?
The StarPhoenix has reported the details over the years of the four year rape of 8 year old girls in a Saskatoon foster home as defamatory libel when the editors knew the truth that children were being raped and tortured in a Saskatoon foster home when Johanna and John Lucas were being maliciously prosecuted in 1993 for exposing a fact known to be true by the editors. The Ross Twins were being allowed to be raped in a Saskatoon foster home with the full knowledge of Saskatchewan Justice, Social Services and the Saskatoon StarPhoenix.
The fact that the article does not include anything about the prosecutor, Matt Miazga, being found by three judges in Saskatchewan of maliciously prosecuting innocent people leaves this newspaper not fit to be used in a outhouse to wipe one’s ass with.
Information on Cases Docket 32208 Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello), et al. v. Carole Bunko-Ruys, et al. (Sask.) (Civil) (By Leave)
(Publication ban in case) (Publication ban on party)
Date Proceeding Filed By 2008-08-29 Letter sent to Intervener(s) 2008-08-28 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (BY CHARRON J.) Attorney General of Canada 2008-08-28 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Cha, UPON APPLICATIONS by the Attorney General of Canada, the Attorney General of Ontario, the Attorney General of Quebec and Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions of Quebec, the Attorney General of Nova Scotia, the Attorney General of New Brunswick, the Attorney General of Manitoba, the Attorney General of British Columbia, the Attorney General of Saskatchewan, the Attorney General of Alberta and the Canadian Association of Crown Counsel for leave to intervene in the above appeal; AND UPON APPLICATION by the Association in Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted for an extension of time to apply for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene in the above appeal; AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The motions for leave to intervene of the Attorney General of Canada, the Attorney General of Ontario, the Attorney General of Quebec and Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions of Quebec, the Attorney General of Nova Scotia, the Attorney General of New Brunswick, the Attorney General of Manitoba, the Attorney General of British Columbia, the Attorney General of Saskatchewan, the Attorney General of Alberta and the Canadian Association of Crown Counsel are granted and the said interveners shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 10 pages in length. The motion for an extension of time to apply for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene of the Association in Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted is granted and the said intervener shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length. The requests to present oral argument are deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the interveners. The interveners shall not be entitled to raise new issues or to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties. Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondents any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondents by their intervention. Granted, . 2008-08-28 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Cha
2008-08-22 Notice of hearing sent to parties 2008-08-22 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2008-12-12 2008-08-15 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, e-mail from Gowlings dated Aug. 15/08 (by all other interveners), Completed on: 2008-08-15 Matthew Miazga 2008-08-15 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, e-mail from Gowlings dated Aug. 15/08 (by A.G. of Sask. and Can. Ass. of Crown Counsel), Completed on: 2008-08-15 Matthew Miazga 2008-08-13 Appeal perfected for hearing 2008-08-01 Motion for leave to intervene, (joint with an extension of time), Completed on: 2008-08-01 Association in Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted 2008-07-31 Correspondence received from, E. Holgate, dated July 30, 2008, re: will not be filing a record or book of authorities, will not file materials on motion for leave to intervene Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello) 2008-07-31 Respondent's factum, Completed on: 2008-07-31 Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello) 2008-07-31 Correspondence received from, Kari and Richard Klassen (by fax) dated July 31/08 re: adopt the position of the other respondents and that Richard Klassen would like to appear before the Court Kari Klassen 2008-07-28 Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2008-08-07 Attorney General of Quebec and Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions of Quebec 2008-07-28 Motion for leave to intervene, (bookform), Completed on: 2008-07-28 Attorney General of Ontario 2008-07-28 Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2008-08-07 Attorney General of Canada 2008-07-28 Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2008-08-07 Attorney General of British Columbia 2008-07-25 Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2008-07-25 Attorney General of Alberta 2008-07-25 Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2008-07-25 Attorney General of New Brunswick 2008-07-25 Motion for leave to intervene, (bookform), Completed on: 2008-08-07 Canadian Association of Crown Counsel 2008-07-23 Correspondence received from, Mr. Holgate by fax dated Aug-27-07(sic) re: agent Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello) 2008-07-18 Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2008-08-07 Attorney General of Saskatchewan 2008-07-18 Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2008-08-07 Attorney General of Manitoba 2008-07-18 Order on motion to dispense with printing Matthew Miazga 2008-07-18 Decision on motion to dispense with printing, of the exhibits contained in Part V of the printed copies of the Appellant's Record, Reg Granted, no order as to costs 2008-07-18 Submission of motion to dispense with printing, Reg
2008-07-09 Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2008-07-10 Attorney General of Nova Scotia 2008-06-30 Appellant's book of authorities, CD-rom returned on July-17-08-rec'd Aug-13-08, Completed on: 2008-08-13 Matthew Miazga 2008-06-30 Appellant's factum, Completed on: 2008-06-30 Matthew Miazga 2008-06-27 Appellant's record, 76 volumes (vol 1-3, 24 copies and vol 25 -76, 1copy), Completed on: 2008-07-16 Matthew Miazga 2008-06-12 Response to motion to dispense with printing, Completed on: 2008-06-12 Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello) 2008-06-12 Motion to dispense with printing, of the exhibits comprising Part V of the appellant's record, Completed on: 2008-06-12 Matthew Miazga 2008-06-03 Order on motion to extend time Matthew Miazga 2008-06-03 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the appellant, Matthew Miazga, factum, record and book of authorities to June 30/08, Reg Granted, no order as to costs 2008-06-03 Submission of motion to extend time, Reg
2008-05-23 Response to motion to extend time, (consent included in the motion for extension of time), Completed on: 2008-06-02 Richard Klassen 2008-05-23 Response to motion to extend time, (consent included with motion for extension of time), Completed on: 2008-05-23 Kari Klassen 2008-05-23 Motion to extend time, to serve and file factum, Record and Authorities to June 30/08 - consent from Kari and Richard Klassen included, Completed on: 2008-06-03 Matthew Miazga 2008-03-14 Letter advising the parties of the tentative hearing date and filing deadlines 2008-03-12 Notice of deposit for security, (service missing - rec'd March 13/08) Matthew Miazga 2008-03-05 Notice of appeal, (CD-ROM and Notice of deposit for security - rec'd March 12/08), Completed on: 2008-03-12 Matthew Miazga 2008-02-08 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties 2008-02-08 Judgment on leave sent to the parties 2008-02-08 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties 2008-02-08 Judgment on leave sent to the parties 2008-02-07 Decision on the application for leave to appeal, (SECOND APPLICATION), CJ F Ro, The application by Matthew Miazga for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, Number 877, 2007 SKCA 57, dated May 30, 2007, is granted. Granted, . 2008-02-07 Decision on the application for leave to appeal, (FIRST APPLICATION), CJ F Ro, The motions for leave to intervene by Canadian Association of Crown Counsel and Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada are dismissed. The application by Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello) et al. for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, Number 884, 2007 SKCA 57, dated May 30, 2007, is dismissed. Dismissed, . 2008-02-07 Decision on motion for leave to intervene, (see above judgment), CJ F Ro Dismissed, . 2008-01-11 Correspondence received from, Kari Klassen by fax dated Jan-11-08 re: is now self represented Kari Klassen 2007-12-17 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ F Ro
2007-12-17 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, CJ F Ro
2007-10-23 Order on motion to extend time Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada 2007-10-23 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve upon the parties, Richard A. Klassen and Kari Klassen, the motion for leave to intervene of the Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada, to Oct. 3/07, Reg Granted, . 2007-10-23 Submission of motion to extend time, Reg
2007-10-15 Correspondence received from, S.J. Moreau, dated Oct. 12/07; CACC applies to leave to intervene only in respect of Mr. Miazga's leave app. Canadian Association of Crown Counsel 2007-10-10 Motion to extend time, to serve Richard and Kari Klassen, Completed on: 2007-10-05 Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada 2007-10-05 Correspondence received from, Edward Holgate dated Sept. 27/07 re: no longer acting for Kari Klassen Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello) 2007-10-01 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, FIRST APPLICATION, Completed on: 2007-10-01 Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello) 2007-09-28 Motion for leave to intervene, (bookform), Completed on: 2007-09-28 Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada 2007-09-27 Motion for leave to intervene, (bookform) (only in respect of Mr. Miazga's leave app.), Completed on: 2007-09-27 Canadian Association of Crown Counsel 2007-09-27 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Will not be filing a response to SECOND application, Completed on: 2007-09-27 Richard Klassen 2007-09-27 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Will not be filing a response to SECOND application, Completed on: 2007-09-27 Kari Klassen 2007-09-26 Correspondence received from, from Edward Holgate, cousel for Applicants (First Application) and for Respondents (Second Application), re.: no longer acting for Kari Klassen in First & Second Application Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello) 2007-09-26 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, SECOND APPLICATION (Proof of service requested - rec'd Oct. 10/07), Completed on: 2007-10-10 Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello) 2007-09-24 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Response to FIRST APPLICATION, Completed on: 2007-09-24 Carole Bunko-Ruys 2007-09-06 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal 2007-09-06 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal 2007-08-29 Book of authorities, SECOND APPLICATION Matthew Miazga 2007-08-29 Application for leave to appeal, SECOND APPLICATION (for C/A Number 877), Completed on: 2007-08-29 Matthew Miazga 2007-08-28 Application for leave to appeal, FIRST APPLICATION (for C/A Number 884), Completed on: 2007-08-28 Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello)
![[EFC Blue Ribbon - Free Speech Online]](http://www.efc.ca/images/efcfreet.gif)
